Literature DB >> 7623721

Assessment of competence in technical clinical skills of general practitioners.

J J Jansen1, L H Tan, C P van der Vleuten, S J van Luijk, J J Rethans, R P Grol.   

Abstract

Technical clinical procedures constitute an important part of the work of general practitioners. Assessment of competence in the relevant skills is important from the perspective of quality assurance. In this study, the psychometric characteristics of three different methods for assessment of competence in technical clinical skills in general practice were evaluated. A performance-based test (8 stations), a written knowledge test of skills (125 items) and a self-assessment questionnaire (41 items) on technical clinical skills were administered to 49 GPs and 47 trainees in general practice. The mean scores on the performance-based test and the written knowledge test of skills showed no substantial differences between GPs and trainees, whereas the GPs scored higher on the self-assessment questionnaire. While the correlation of the score on the knowledge test of skills with the score on the performance-based test was moderately high, the score on the self-assessment questionnaire showed a rather low correlation with the performance-based test. Although performance-based testing is obviously the best method to assess proficiency in hands-on skills, a written test can serve as a reasonable alternative, particularly for screening and research purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623721     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02839.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Clinical skills assessment.

Authors:  M H Kelly; L M Campbell; T S Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  What determines competence within a general practice consultation? Assessment of consultation skills using simulated surgeries.

Authors:  J Allen; A Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Improving in-training evaluation programs.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J Gray; J MacFadyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Assessing quality in primary care. Can we ask the right questions?

Authors:  A Borgiel; J J O'Neil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Minor surgical procedures. Faculty development workshop.

Authors:  L Nasmith; E D Franco
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Clinical undergraduate training and assessment in primary health care: experiences gained from Crete, Greece.

Authors:  George Belos; Christos Lionis; Michael Fioretos; John Vlachonicolis; Anastas Philalithis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Capacity evaluation for general practitioners in Pudong new area of Shanghai: an empirical study.

Authors:  Ming Li; Zhiqun Shu; Xuan Huang; Zhaohui Du; Jun Wu; Qingshi Xia; Kun Liu; Jiquan Lou; Limei Jing
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-11-28

9.  Curriculum factors influencing knowledge of communication skills among medical students.

Authors:  Anders Baerheim; Per Hjortdahl; Are Holen; Tor Anvik; Ole Bernt Fasmer; Hilde Grimstad; Tore Gude; Terje Risberg; Per Vaglum
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Assessment of Competence in Emergency Medicine among Healthcare Professionals in Cameroon.

Authors:  Sang Chul Kim; Young Sun Ro; Sang Do Shin; Dae Han Wi; Joongsik Jeong; Ju Ok Park; Kyong Min Sun; Kwangsoo Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.