Literature DB >> 7623396

Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation.

D P Desmond1, J F Maddux, T H Johnson, B A Confer.   

Abstract

Studies of the outcomes of substance abuse treatment are often handicapped because of subjects lost to follow-up. While follow-up data may be obtained from several sources, the follow-up interview often serves as the principal source of data. Difficulties are regularly encountered in locating and interviewing subjects not in treatment. From review of the literature on follow-up methodology and our own experience, we identified 10 procedures for effective follow-up. Application of these procedures is illustrated in a follow-up study of illicit opioid users treated in a methadone maintenance program. Follow-up interviews were obtained with 98% of the subjects. We recommend use of the 10 procedures by follow-up researchers, and we also recommend review of several previous publications on follow-up methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623396     DOI: 10.1016/0740-5472(94)00076-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  27 in total

1.  Agency-based tracking of difficult-to-follow populations: runaway and homeless youth programs in St. Louis, Missouri.

Authors:  D E Pollio; S J Thompson; C S North
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2000-06

2.  A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.

Authors:  Christy K Scott
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The provision of cell phones as a recruitment and retention strategy for people who inject drugs enrolling in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Catherine Stewart; Hannah Kopinski; Jane Liebschutz; Inga Holmdahl; Julia Keosaian; Debra Herman; Bradley Anderson; Michael Stein
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  The interplay of perceived social support and posttraumatic psychological distress following orofacial injury.

Authors:  Anna Lui; Shirley Glynn; Vivek Shetty
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.254

5.  Study retention as bias reduction in a hard-to-reach population.

Authors:  Bruce Western; Anthony Braga; David Hureau; Catherine Sirois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Developmental trajectories of delinquency symptoms in childhood: the role of marital conflict and autonomic nervous system activity.

Authors:  Mona El-Sheikh; J Benjamin Hinnant; Stephen Erath
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-02

7.  The effectiveness of community-based delivery of an evidence-based treatment for adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Sarah B Hunter; Rajeev Ramchand; Beth Ann Griffin; Marika J Suttorp; Daniel McCaffrey; Andrew Morral
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-12-29

8.  Dismantling the theory of planned behavior: evaluating the relative effectiveness of attempts to uniquely change attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control.

Authors:  Erika A Montanaro; Trace S Kershaw; Angela D Bryan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-04-18

9.  Optimizing follow-up and study retention in the 21st century: Advances from the front line in alcohol and tobacco research.

Authors:  Lia J Smith; Patrick J McNamara; Andrea C King
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Telephone-based assessments to minimize missing data in longitudinal depression trials: a project IMPACTS study report.

Authors:  Cindy Claassen; Ben Kurian; Madhukar H Trivedi; Bruce D Grannemann; Ekta Tuli; Ronny Pipes; Anne Marie Preston; Ariell Flood
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.