Literature DB >> 15072804

A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers.

Christy K Scott1.   

Abstract

The goals of this paper were to: (a) discuss the interface between dominant behavioral patterns of substance users and the development of a follow-up management model, (b) describe the components of the model, (c) present data regarding its effectiveness, (d) estimate the number of contacts for various follow-up rates, (e) explore the generalizability of the model across sub samples, and (f) present client outcome data that underscore the potential negative impact of low follow-up rates. The model has been used to follow-up over 12,000 research participants yielding over a 95% follow-up rate across seven studies (with over 90% completed within +/-14 days of their anniversary date). Using data from two of these studies (n = 2010, n = 632), 22 contacts or less captured 70% of the participants while 33 or 38 contacts or less captured 90% in the first and second studies, respectively. When outcome variables were compared based on 70% versus 90% follow-up, the results varied by study and within study. An examination of the effect of attrition on validity in these two samples demonstrated that even the traditionally acceptable 30% level of attrition can result in significant bias and that the nature of the bias is unpredictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15072804      PMCID: PMC5937263          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  47 in total

1.  Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment.

Authors:  Mark D Godley; Susan H Godley; Michael L Dennis; Rodney Funk; Lora L Passetti
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2002-07

Review 2.  The dual crisis: mental illness and substance abuse. Present and future directions.

Authors:  V B Brown; M S Ridgely; B Pepper; I S Levine; H Ryglewicz
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-03

3.  Psychopathology and attrition in the epidemiologic catchment area surveys.

Authors:  W W Eaton; J C Anthony; S Tepper; A Dryman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Social networks and recovery: one year after inpatient treatment.

Authors:  A J Gordon; M Zrull
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse.

Authors:  R C Kessler; R J Little; R M Groves
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Follow-up difficulty with substance abusers: predictors of time to locate and relationship to outcome.

Authors:  R N Bale; B H Arnoldussen; A M Quittner
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1984-12

7.  For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research.

Authors:  C Fry; R Dwyer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts.

Authors:  Y I Hser; V Hoffman; C E Grella; M D Anglin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-05

9.  Difficulty of follow-up and outcome of alcoholism treatment.

Authors:  R Moos; F Bliss
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1978-03

10.  Follow-up methods to trace women treated for pulmonary tuberculosis, 1930-1954.

Authors:  J D Boice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  82 in total

1.  Compensation effects on clinical trial data collection in opioid-dependent young adults.

Authors:  Claire E Wilcox; Michael P Bogenschutz; Masato Nakazawa; George E Woody
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.829

2.  AASAP: a program to increase recruitment and retention in clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; Danielle Hessler; Diana Naranjo; William Polonsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-08-09

3.  Predictors of Attrition in a Cohort Study of HIV Infection and Methamphetamine Dependence.

Authors:  J Cattie; M J Marquine; K A Bolden; L C Obermeit; E E Morgan; D R Franklin; A Umlauf; J M Beck; J H Atkinson; I Grant; S P Woods
Journal:  J Subst Use       Date:  2015-02-03

4.  Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using Social Media Platforms to Locate and Track Research Participants.

Authors:  Ananya Bhatia-Lin; Alexandra Boon-Dooley; Michelle K Roberts; Caroline Pronai; Dylan Fisher; Lea Parker; Allison Engstrom; Leah Ingraham; Doyanne Darnell
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 5.  Enhancing validity in co-occurring disorders treatment research.

Authors:  Gregory J McHugo; Robert E Drake; Mary F Brunette; Haiyi Xie; Susan M Essock; Alan I Green
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Maximizing follow-up in longitudinal studies of traumatized populations.

Authors:  Christy K Scott; Jeffrey Sonis; Mark Creamer; Michael L Dennis
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2006-12

7.  Retail outlets prompt associative memories linked to the repeated use of nicotine and tobacco products among alternative high school students in California.

Authors:  James Russell Pike; Yusuke Shono; Nasya Tan; Bin Xie; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Does treatment fidelity predict client outcomes in 12-Step Facilitation for stimulant abuse?

Authors:  Joseph Guydish; Barbara K Campbell; Jennifer K Manuel; Kevin L Delucchi; Thao Le; K Michelle Peavy; Dennis McCarty
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Optimizing follow-up and study retention in the 21st century: Advances from the front line in alcohol and tobacco research.

Authors:  Lia J Smith; Patrick J McNamara; Andrea C King
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  The role of negative affect in the persistence of nicotine dependence among alternative high school students: A latent growth curve analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Miller; James Pike; Yusuke Shono; Yuliyana Beleva; Bin Xie; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.