PURPOSE: Missing data in clinical efficacy and effectiveness trials continue to be a major threat to the validity of study findings. The purpose of this report is to describe methods developed to ensure completion of outcome assessments with public mental health sector subjects participating in a longitudinal, repeated measures study for the treatment of major depressive disorder. We developed longitudinal assessment procedures that included telephone-based clinician interviews in order to minimize missing data commonly encountered with face-to-face assessment procedures. METHODS: A pre-planned, multi-step strategy was developed to ensure completeness of data collection. The procedure included obtaining multiple pieces of patient contact information at baseline, careful education of both staff and patients concerning the purpose of assessments, establishing good patient rapport, and finally being flexible and persistent with phone appointments to ensure the completion of telephone-based follow-up assessments. A well-developed administrative and organizational structure was also put in place prior to study implementation. RESULTS: The assessment completion rate for the primary outcome for 310 of 504 subjects who enrolled and completed 52 weeks (at the time of manuscript) of telephone-based follow-up assessments was 96.8%. CONCLUSION: By utilizing telephone-based follow-up procedures and adapting our easy-to-use pre-defined multi-step approach, researchers can maximize patient data retention in longitudinal studies.
PURPOSE: Missing data in clinical efficacy and effectiveness trials continue to be a major threat to the validity of study findings. The purpose of this report is to describe methods developed to ensure completion of outcome assessments with public mental health sector subjects participating in a longitudinal, repeated measures study for the treatment of major depressive disorder. We developed longitudinal assessment procedures that included telephone-based clinician interviews in order to minimize missing data commonly encountered with face-to-face assessment procedures. METHODS: A pre-planned, multi-step strategy was developed to ensure completeness of data collection. The procedure included obtaining multiple pieces of patient contact information at baseline, careful education of both staff and patients concerning the purpose of assessments, establishing good patient rapport, and finally being flexible and persistent with phone appointments to ensure the completion of telephone-based follow-up assessments. A well-developed administrative and organizational structure was also put in place prior to study implementation. RESULTS: The assessment completion rate for the primary outcome for 310 of 504 subjects who enrolled and completed 52 weeks (at the time of manuscript) of telephone-based follow-up assessments was 96.8%. CONCLUSION: By utilizing telephone-based follow-up procedures and adapting our easy-to-use pre-defined multi-step approach, researchers can maximize patient data retention in longitudinal studies.
Authors: Craig H Mallinckrodt; Todd M Sanger; Sanjay Dubé; David J DeBrota; Geert Molenberghs; Raymond J Carroll; William Z Potter; Gary D Tollefson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Jürgen Unützer; Wayne Katon; Christopher M Callahan; John W Williams; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Marc Hoffing; Richard D Della Penna; Polly Hitchcock Noël; Elizabeth H B Lin; Patricia A Areán; Mark T Hegel; Lingqi Tang; Thomas R Belin; Sabine Oishi; Christopher Langston Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yeates Conwell; Adam Simning; Nicole Driffill; Yinglin Xia; Xin Tu; Susan P Messing; David Oslin Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; Caroline Bennette; Karim Touijer; Jonathan Coleman; Vincent Laudone; Brett Carver; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino Journal: Trials Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Kari L Ruud; Annie Leblanc; Rebecca J Mullan; Laurie J Pencille; Kristina Tiedje; Megan E Branda; Holly K Van Houten; Sara R Heim; Margary Kurland; Nilay D Shah; Barbara P Yawn; Victor M Montori Journal: Trials Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Erik Hedman; Brjánn Ljótsson; Kerstin Blom; Samir El Alaoui; Martin Kraepelien; Christian Rück; Gerhard Andersson; Cecilia Svanborg; Nils Lindefors; Viktor Kaldo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 5.428