Literature DB >> 7622392

A review of impedance cardiography.

L Jensen1, J Yakimets, K K Teo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the reliability and validity estimates of impedance cardiography to assess its empirical precision and clinical usefulness. DATA SOURCE: Empirical and theoretical literature mainly within the last 10 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: Descriptive statistics used to summarize the accuracy and use of impedance cardiography to estimate stroke volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of cardiac output is presently a core component of optimizing cardiac function in many patient populations. Impedance cardiography, which initially used a formula developed by Kubicek et al. and recently a formula developed by Sramek and Bernstein, remains controversial with regard to its accuracy and use in research and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7622392     DOI: 10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80036-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  8 in total

1.  Thoracic geometry and its relation to electrical current distribution: consequences for electrode placement in electrical impedance cardiography.

Authors:  E Raaijmakers; T J Faes; H G Goovaerts; J H Meijer; P M de Vries; R M Heethaar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Descending aortic flow contribution to intrathoracic impedance-development and preliminary testing of a dual impedance model.

Authors:  A Barry Baker; Chris N McLeod; Alastair J Roxburgh; Paul Bannister
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Beat-to-beat estimation of stroke volume using impedance cardiography and artificial neural network.

Authors:  S M M Naidu; Prem C Pandey; Uttam R Bagal; Suhas P Hardas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 5.  Reliability and validity of measures of cardiac output during incremental to maximal aerobic exercise. Part II: Novel techniques and new advances.

Authors:  D E Warburton; M J Haykowsky; H A Quinney; D P Humen; K K Teo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Djordje G Jakovljevic; Sarah Moore; Kate Hallsworth; Gulnar Fattakhova; Christian Thoma; Michael I Trenell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Validation of thoracic impedance cardiography by echocardiography in healthy late pregnancy.

Authors:  Jordan P R McIntyre; Kevin M Ellyett; Edwin A Mitchell; Gina M Quill; John Md Thompson; Alistair W Stewart; Robert N Doughty; Peter R Stone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution.

Authors:  Eric E C de Waal; Maurits K Konings; Cor J Kalkman; Wolfgang F Buhre
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 17.440

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.