Literature DB >> 7621840

Vasodilation-related adverse events in diltiazem and dihydropyridine calcium antagonists studied by prescription-event monitoring.

K Kubota, G L Pearce, W H Inman.   

Abstract

The incidence of vasodilation-related events (flushing, headache, dizziness and oedema) was determined in a total of 37,670 patients treated with diltiazem, nicardipine, isradipine or amlodipine and studied by Prescription-Event Monitoring between 1984 and 1991. Event rates are expressed as the percentage of patients who experienced these events during the six months after the first prescription. The rates for all these events with the newer vasoselective dihydropyridines (nicardipine, isradipine and amlodipine) were higher than those with diltiazem. Among the three dihydropyridines, there were large individual differences in the rates. With nicardipine, the frequency of each of the four vasodilation-related events were similar to one another (approximately 3%). With isradipine, the rates were also similar to one another but all were approximately twice those measured in the nicardipine study (approximately 6%). These differences may have been due to confounding factors such as the publicity about adverse drug reactions, the indication for use by individual patients or the doses actually being used at the time the event occurred. With amlodipine, in contrast, the rate for oedema was two to four times larger than the rates for flushing, headache or dizziness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621840     DOI: 10.1007/bf00202163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  11 in total

Review 1.  New calcium antagonists: relevance of vasoselectivity.

Authors:  W W Parmley
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  The safety of amlodipine.

Authors:  I Osterloh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Calcium antagonists for congestive heart failure: is it really one bridge too far to cross?

Authors:  L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 4.  'Second generation' dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Greater vascular selectivity and some unique applications.

Authors:  D D Freedman; D D Waters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Isradipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  A Fitton; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Early side-effects of antihypertensive therapy: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine retard.

Authors:  A D Bremner; P J Fell; J Hosie; I G James; P A Saul; S H Taylor
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Nicardipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in the treatment of angina pectoris, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; S P Clissold
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Prescription-event monitoring: methodology and recent progress.

Authors:  N S Rawson; G L Pearce; W H Inman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Hemodynamic response, safety, and efficacy of isradipine in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  B Dahlöf
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-04-17       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  6 in total

1.  Younger females are at greater risk of vasodilation-related adverse symptoms caused by dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: results of a study of 11,918 Japanese patients.

Authors:  Ayami Kajiwara; Junji Saruwatari; Ayana Kita; Kentaro Oniki; Masato Yamamura; Motoji Murase; Haruo Koda; Seisuke Hirota; Tadao Ishizuka; Kazuko Nakagawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Efficacy and safety of amlodipine: a comparative study of hypertensive patients treated at primary- and specialised-care centres.

Authors:  Y Valcárcel; R Jiménez; V Hernández; R Arístegui; A Gil
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M Haria; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine in the general practice treatment of essential hypertension in an asian multinational population.

Authors:  S H Taylor; M F Chen; S J Lee; B Koanantakul; J R Zhu; T Santoso; R G Sy; Y T Tai
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Excellent tolerance to cilnidipine in hypertensives with amlodipine - induced edema.

Authors:  Ranjan Shetty; G Vivek; Kushal Naha; Anil Tumkur; Abhinav Raj; K L Bairy
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01

Review 6.  Calcium channel blocker-related periperal edema: can it be resolved?

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.