Literature DB >> 12939574

Calcium channel blocker-related periperal edema: can it be resolved?

Domenic A Sica1.   

Abstract

Calcium channel blocker (CCB)-related edema is quite common in clinical practice and can effectively deter a clinician from continued prescription of these drugs. Its etiology relates to a decrease in arteriolar resistance that goes unmatched in the venous circulation. This disproportionate change in resistance increases hydrostatic pressures in the precapillary circulation and permits fluid shifts into the interstitial compartment. CCB-related edema is more common in women and relates to upright posture, age, and the choice and dose of the CCB. Once present it can be slow to resolve without intervention. A number of strategies exist to treat CCB-related edema, including switching CCB classes, reducing the dosage, and/or adding a known venodilator such as a nitrate, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin-receptor blocker to the treatment regimen. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been best studied in this regard. Diuretics may alter the edema state somewhat, but at the expense of further reducing plasma volume. Traditional measures such as limiting the amount of time that a patient is upright and/or considering use of graduated compression stockings are useful adjunctive therapies. Discontinuing the CCB and switching to an alternative antihypertensive therapy will resolve the edema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939574      PMCID: PMC8099365          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.02402.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  36 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular permeability.

Authors:  C C Michel; F E Curry
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Calcium channel blockers, postural vasoconstriction and dependent oedema in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Pedrinelli; G Dell'Omo; M Mariani
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Vasodilatory edema: a common side effect of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  F H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and peripheral side effects.

Authors:  A Sirker; C G Missouris; G A MacGregor
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Effects of long-acting calcium channel antagonists on neurohumoral factors: comparison of nifedipine coat-core with amlodipine.

Authors:  Takayoshi Tsutamoto; Takashi Tsutsui; Keiko Maeda; Masaru Hayashi; Atsuyuki Wada; Masato Ohnishi; Masanori Fujii; Chitose Ishii
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators.

Authors:  R A Kloner; M Weinberger; J L Pool; S G Chrysant; R Prasad; S M Harris; T M Zyczynski; N K Leidy; E L Michelson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Fluid retention after initiation of thiazolidinedione therapy in diabetic patients with established chronic heart failure.

Authors:  W H Wilson Tang; Gary S Francis; Byron J Hoogwerf; James B Young
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Pedrinelli; G Dell'Omo; E Melillo; M Mariani
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Faster clearance of sustained release verapamil in men versus women: continuing observations on sex-specific differences after oral administration of verapamil.

Authors:  M E Krecic-Shepard; C R Barnas; J Slimko; J B Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Ankle edema formation during treatment with the calcium channel blockers lacidipine and amlodipine: a single-centre study.

Authors:  M B Andrésdóttir; H W van Hamersvelt; M J van Helden; W J van de Bosch; I M Valk; F T Huysmans
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.105

View more
  30 in total

1.  Follow-up of Antihypertensive Therapy Improves Blood Pressure Control: Results of HYT (HYperTension survey) Follow-up.

Authors:  F Fici; G Seravalle; N Koylan; I Nalbantgil; N Cagla; Y Korkut; F Quarti-Trevano; W Makel; G Grassi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-05-11

2.  Time Series Disturbance Detection for Hypothesis-Free Signal Detection in Longitudinal Observational Databases.

Authors:  Ed Whalen; Manfred Hauben; Andrew Bate
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Acute compartment syndrome of the foot in a soccer player: a case report.

Authors:  Michelle A Laframboise; Brad Muir
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-12

4.  An evaluation of a potential calcium channel blocker-lower-extremity edema-loop diuretic prescribing cascade.

Authors:  Scott Martin Vouri; Joseph S van Tuyl; Margaret A Olsen; Hong Xian; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2018-07-20

5.  Hypoxia-reoxygenation-induced endothelial barrier failure: role of RhoA, Rac1 and myosin light chain kinase.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam; Klaus-Dieter Schluter; Susanne Rohrbach; Amir Rafiq; Sabiha Nazli; Hans Michael Piper; Thomas Noll; Rainer Schulz; Dursun Gündüz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Evaluation of a Common Prescribing Cascade of Calcium Channel Blockers and Diuretics in Older Adults With Hypertension.

Authors:  Rachel D Savage; Jessica D Visentin; Susan E Bronskill; Xuesong Wang; Andrea Gruneir; Vasily Giannakeas; Jun Guan; Kenneth Lam; Miles J Luke; Stephanie H Read; Nathan M Stall; Wei Wu; Lynn Zhu; Paula A Rochon; Lisa M McCarthy
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Human lymphatic vessel contractile activity is inhibited in vitro but not in vivo by the calcium channel blocker nifedipine.

Authors:  Niklas Telinius; Sheyanth Mohanakumar; Jens Majgaard; Sukhan Kim; Hans Pilegaard; Einar Pahle; Jørn Nielsen; Marc de Leval; Christian Aalkjaer; Vibeke Hjortdal; Donna Briggs Boedtkjer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Efficacy and safety of a stepped-care regimen using olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension: an open-label, long-term study.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Cristina Miele; Uwe Haag
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Calcium Channel Blockers Co-prescribed with Loop Diuretics: A Potential Marker of Poor Prescribing?

Authors:  Henry J Woodford
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.

Authors:  J Schrader; A Salvetti; C Calvo; E Akpinar; L Keeling; M Weisskopf; P Brunel
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.