Literature DB >> 7621455

Downstaging by combination therapy with flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy.

F Labrie1, L Cusan, J L Gomez, P Diamond, R Suburu, M Lemay, B Têtu, Y Fradet, B Candas.   

Abstract

A total of 161 patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the anti-androgen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery for a 39.2% increase in specimen confined disease. Although on average the final stage determined at histopathological examination of the surgical specimen was more advanced than predicted at initial diagnosis in 33.8% of control patients, an opposite observation was made in the group of men who received the 3 month neoadjuvant combination therapy where the final stage, instead of being more advanced, was less advanced than at diagnosis in an average of 21.1% of men for a net 54.9% improvement of staging in favour of combination therapy. On the other hand, organ confined disease increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.9% increase in the incidence of organ confined disease. Although long term follow up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Surv        ISSN: 0261-2429


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Significance of neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  R Paul; H Van Randenborgh; H Kübler; M Alschibaja; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Guideline-discordant androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer: patterns of use in the medicare population and cost implications.

Authors:  A R Kuykendal; L H Hendrix; R G Salloum; P A Godley; R C Chen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Therapeutic strategies for localized prostate cancer I: surgery, ultrasound, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  M I Resnick; E D Crawford; M E Gleave; J Lynch; J P Mulhall; K Pummer; G Vallancien
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

4.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Prostate Cancer: An Oncologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Kent; Maha Ha Hussain
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Novel hormonal approaches in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Terence W Friedlander; Charles J Ryan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Kumar; M Shelley; C Harrison; B Coles; T J Wilt; M D Mason
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for low-risk prostate cancer induces biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy via increased lymphangiogenesis-related parameters.

Authors:  Yasuyoshi Miyata; Yuichiro Nakamura; Takuji Yasuda; Tomohiro Matsuo; Kojiro Ohba; Bungo Furusato; Junya Fukuoka; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.104

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.