Literature DB >> 7621340

Bone density in medieval skeletons.

I Ekenman1, S A Eriksson, J U Lindgren.   

Abstract

We studied the most complete skeletons found in an excavation from the 14th and 15th century in central Stockholm. One hundred eighty-seven were from men and 156 from women: 241 individuals were estimated to be between 20 and 39 and 102 between 40 and 59 years old at death. We examined the bones radiographically and by dual photon absorptiometry. The bone mineral density (BMD) was similar to the finding in North America and Northern Europe today as was the relationship between men and women. However, there appeared to be a higher diaphyseal bone density in the lower extremities, especially in men. The femur score was higher and the BMD of the femoral and tibial shafts was higher than today. In the upper extremities the diaphyseal bone density was lower. Meema's index, as well as the metacarpal score, was smaller than in individuals in this century and the BMD of the humeral shaft was also lower than seen today. Overall, the metaphyseal bone density was similar to what we now consider normal; i.e., the mean BMD of the femoral neck was 0.96 g/cm2 in men and 0.90 g/cm2 in women and of the distal radius 0.43 and 0.32 g/cm2, respectively. The low diaphyseal density and in the upper extremities may be related to the nutritional status, whereas the greater need for walking and standing in the 14th and 15th century might have led to the high diaphyseal density in the lower extremities. There was no evidence of bone loss after 40 years of age in either sex in our study. The average expected lifespan for an adult individual was less than 50 years and we suggest that the relatively high bone density in the older age group may be due to selection of the most physically fit. The activity pattern, therefore, may be considered the most important determinant for the differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7621340     DOI: 10.1007/bf00301601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  14 in total

1.  LOSS OF COMPACT BONE DUE TO MENOPAUSE.

Authors:  H E MEEMA; M L BUNKER; S MEEMA
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death.

Authors:  M TROTTER; G C GLESER
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1958-03       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal women: a cross-sectional study of 717 Finnish volunteers.

Authors:  H Kröger; J Heikkinen; K Laitinen; A Kotaniemi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The incidence of osteoporosis in normal women: its relation to age and the menopause.

Authors:  B E Nordin; J MacGregor; D A Smith
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1966-01

6.  Bone mineral density of female athletes in different sports.

Authors:  A Heinonen; P Oja; P Kannus; H Sievänen; A Mänttäri; I Vuori
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1993-10

7.  The increase in the height of Swedish men and women from the middle of the 19th century up to 1930, and the changes in the height of the individual from the ages of 26 to 70; based on measurements of 46,000 persons.

Authors:  I HOLMGREN
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1952-03-24

8.  The effects of race and body habitus on bone mineral density of the radius, hip, and spine in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Y Liel; J Edwards; J Shary; K M Spicer; L Gordon; N H Bell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  [Evaluation of the mineral content of peripheral bones (radius) by photon-absorption technique in normals as well as in patients with various types of bone diseases (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Runge; F Fengler; J Franke; W Koall
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Differences in proximal femur bone density over two centuries.

Authors:  B Lees; T Molleson; T R Arnett; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

Authors:  N C Nowlan; K J Jepsen; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Gradual decline in mobility with the adoption of food production in Europe.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff; Brigitte Holt; Markku Niskanen; Vladimir Sladek; Margit Berner; Evan Garofalo; Heather M Garvin; Martin Hora; Juho-Antti Junno; Eliska Schuplerova; Rosa Vilkama; Erin Whittey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  X-ray, CT and DXA study of bone loss on medieval remains from North-West Italy.

Authors:  Alda Borrè; Rosa Boano; Marco Di Stefano; Anna Castiglione; Giovannino Ciccone; Giovanni Carlo Isaia; Gian Luigi Panattoni; Carlo Faletti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Social stratification reflected in bone mineral density and stature: Spectral imaging and osteoarchaeological findings from medieval Norway.

Authors:  Elin T Brødholt; Kaare M Gautvik; Clara-Cecilie Günther; Torstein Sjøvold; Per Holck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Bone loss markers in the earliest Pacific Islanders.

Authors:  Justyna J Miszkiewicz; Frédérique Valentin; Christina Vrahnas; Natalie A Sims; Jitraporn Vongsvivut; Mark J Tobin; Geoffrey Clark
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Androgen receptor polyglutamine repeat number: models of selection and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Calen P Ryan; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.