Literature DB >> 7620910

The effect of environmental odors emanating from commercial swine operations on the mood of nearby residents.

S S Schiffman1, E A Miller, M S Suggs, B G Graham.   

Abstract

The effect of environmental odors emanating from large-scale hog operations on the mood of nearby residents was determined using the POMS (Profile of Mood States). The scores for six POMS factors and the TMD (total mood disturbance score) for 44 experimental subjects were compared to those of 44 control subjects who were matched according to gender, race, age, and years of education. The results indicated a significant difference between control and experimental subjects for all six POMS factors and the TMD. Persons living near the intensive swine operations who experienced the odors reported significantly more tension, more depression, more anger, less vigor, more fatigue, and more confusion than control subjects as measured by the POMS. Persons exposed to the odors also had more total mood disturbance than controls as determined by their ratings on the POMS. Both innate physiological responses and learned responses may play a role in the impairment of mood found here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7620910     DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)00015-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  41 in total

1.  A watershed-based cumulative risk impact analysis: environmental vulnerability and impact criteria.

Authors:  S L Osowski; J D Swick; G R Carney; H B Pena; J E Danielson; D A Parrish
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Proposed mega-dairies and quality-of-life concerns: using public health practices to engage neighbors.

Authors:  Hans D Schmalzried; L Fleming Fallon
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Asthma symptoms among adolescents who attend public schools that are located near confined swine feeding operations.

Authors:  Maria C Mirabelli; Steve Wing; Stephen W Marshall; Timothy C Wilcosky
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Integrating epidemiology, education, and organizing for environmental justice: community health effects of industrial hog operations.

Authors:  Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Naeema Muhammad; Gary R Grant; Mansoureh Tajik; Kendall Thu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Malodor as a trigger of stress and negative mood in neighbors of industrial hog operations.

Authors:  Rachel Avery Horton; Steve Wing; Stephen W Marshall; Kimberly A Brownley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The role of social and built environments in predicting self-rated stress: A multilevel analysis in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Tse-Chuan Yang; Stephen A Matthews
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Chloroform extract of hog barn dust modulates skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium-release channel (RyR1).

Authors:  Chengju Tian; Chun Hong Shao; Danielle S Fenster; Mark Mixan; Debra J Romberger; Myron L Toews; Keshore R Bidasee
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-24

8.  Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.

Authors:  Peter S Thorne; Anne C Ansley; Sarah Spencer Perry
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Intensive hog farming operations and self-reported health among nearby rural residents in Ottawa, Canada.

Authors:  Paul J Villeneuve; Amira Ali; Laurel Challacombe; Sophie Hebert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The relationship between odour annoyance scores and modelled ambient air pollution in Sarnia, "Chemical Valley", Ontario.

Authors:  Dominic Odwa Atari; Isaac N Luginaah; Karen Fung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.