OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the health effects of living in close proximity to industrial swine operations. We assessed the relationship between estimated exposure to airborne effluent from confined swine feeding operations and asthma symptoms among adolescents who were aged 12 to 14 years. METHODS: During the 1999-2000 school year, 58169 adolescents in North Carolina answered questions about their respiratory symptoms, allergies, medications, socioeconomic status, and household environments. To estimate the extent to which these students may have been exposed during the school day to air pollution from confined swine feeding operations, we used publicly available data about schools (n = 265) and swine operations (n = 2343) to generate estimates of exposure for each public school. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for wheezing within the past year were estimated using random-intercepts binary regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, including age, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, school exposures, and household exposures. RESULTS: The prevalence of wheezing during the past year was slightly higher at schools that were estimated to be exposed to airborne effluent from confined swine feeding operations. For students who reported allergies, the prevalence of wheezing within the past year was 5% higher at schools that were located within 3 miles of an operation relative to those beyond 3 miles and 24% higher at schools in which livestock odor was noticeable indoors twice per month or more relative to those with no odor. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated exposure to airborne pollution from confined swine feeding operations is associated with adolescents' wheezing symptoms.
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the health effects of living in close proximity to industrial swine operations. We assessed the relationship between estimated exposure to airborne effluent from confined swine feeding operations and asthma symptoms among adolescents who were aged 12 to 14 years. METHODS: During the 1999-2000 school year, 58169 adolescents in North Carolina answered questions about their respiratory symptoms, allergies, medications, socioeconomic status, and household environments. To estimate the extent to which these students may have been exposed during the school day to air pollution from confined swine feeding operations, we used publicly available data about schools (n = 265) and swine operations (n = 2343) to generate estimates of exposure for each public school. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for wheezing within the past year were estimated using random-intercepts binary regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, including age, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, school exposures, and household exposures. RESULTS: The prevalence of wheezing during the past year was slightly higher at schools that were estimated to be exposed to airborne effluent from confined swine feeding operations. For students who reported allergies, the prevalence of wheezing within the past year was 5% higher at schools that were located within 3 miles of an operation relative to those beyond 3 miles and 24% higher at schools in which livestock odor was noticeable indoors twice per month or more relative to those with no odor. CONCLUSIONS: Estimated exposure to airborne pollution from confined swine feeding operations is associated with adolescents' wheezing symptoms.
Authors: Elizabeth Chrischilles; Richard Ahrens; Angela Kuehl; Kevin Kelly; Peter Thorne; Leon Burmeister; James Merchant Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: P F Vogelzang; J W van der Gulden; H Folgering; J J Kolk; D Heederik; L Preller; M J Tielen; C P van Schayck Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J Riedler; C Braun-Fahrländer; W Eder; M Schreuer; M Waser; S Maisch; D Carr; R Schierl; D Nowak; E von Mutius Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-10-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P F Vogelzang; J W van der Gulden; L Preller; D Heederik; M J Tielen; C P van Schayck Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Naeema Muhammad; Gary R Grant; Mansoureh Tajik; Kendall Thu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine Loftus; Zahra Afsharinejad; Paul Sampson; Sverre Vedal; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Maria Tchong-French; Catherine Karr Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Annette M O'Connor; Brent Auvermann; Danelle Bickett-Weddle; Steve Kirkhorn; Jan M Sargeant; Alejandro Ramirez; Susanna G Von Essen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Brian T Pavilonis; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Ralph Altmaier; Nervana Metwali; Peter S Thorne Journal: Environ Sci Process Impacts Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.238