Literature DB >> 7615763

Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240.

J T Shigei1, J A Shimabukuro, M T Pezzlo, L M de la Maza, E M Peterson.   

Abstract

Blood cultures collected in BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottles and BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F bottles were monitored for 5 days by BACTEC 9240 and subsequent terminal subcultures. Of the 13,471 bottles subcultured, 11.0% (1,477 of 13,471) were culture positive. Of these, 94.0% (1,388 of 1,477) were detected by BACTEC 9240; the additional 6.0% (89 of 1,477) were considered to be false negatives by BACTEC 9240 since they were detected by terminal subculture only. The false-negative bottles consisted of 17 BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and 72 BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F bottles, accounting for 2.2 (17 of 786) and 10.4% (72 of 691) of the total positive aerobic and anaerobic bottles, respectively. The positive blood culture bottles most frequently not detected by BACTEC 9240 grew Pseudomonas spp. (24), Staphylococcus spp. (21), and yeasts (24). Of the 86 blood cultures represented by the 89 false-negative bottles, 41 would not have been identified as positive since the other bottle in the blood culture set was either a false negative or a true negative. In general, terminal subcultures of false-negative BACTEC bottles had heavy growth, indicating that BACTEC Plus media were able to support the growth of microorganisms, but the BACTEC 9240 instrument was unable to detect this growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615763      PMCID: PMC228174          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1385-1388.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

Review 1.  Statistical methods in microbiology.

Authors:  D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; M L Wilson; L J Harrell; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using fluorescent-sensor technology (BACTEC 9240).

Authors:  F S Nolte; J M Williams; R C Jerris; J A Morello; C D Leitch; S Matushek; L D Schwabe; F Dorigan; F E Kocka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Critical assessment of blood culture techniques: analysis of recovery of obligate and facultative anaerobes, strict aerobic bacteria, and fungi in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  P R Murray; P Traynor; D Hopson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator 10 blood culturing systems.

Authors:  J J Tarrand; C Guillot; M Wenglar; J Jackson; J D Lajeunesse; K V Rolston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Enhanced detection of bacteremia with a new BACTEC resin blood culture medium.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; D G Beckwith; J R Dipersio; J W Dyke; J F Salventi; L L Stone
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR BACTEC PLUS system and the standard (5 ml) NR BACTEC system.

Authors:  F P Koontz; K K Flint; J K Reynolds; S D Allen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M L Wilson; L J Harrell; S Mirrett; M P Weinstein; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results.

Authors:  Q Qian; Y W Tang; C P Kolbert; C A Torgerson; J G Hughes; E A Vetter; W S Harmsen; S O Montgomery; F R Cockerill; D H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Use of the BACTEC 9240 System with Mycosis-IC/F blood culture bottles for detection of fungemia.

Authors:  Hélène Fricker-Hidalgo; Bernadette Lebeau; Hervé Pelloux; Renée Grillot
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Effect of inoculum size on detection of Candida growth by the BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system using aerobic and anaerobic media.

Authors:  Benjamin J George; Lynn L Horvath; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.

Authors:  R Ziegler; I Johnscher; P Martus; D Lenhardt; H M Just
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; S Mirrett; L B Reller; L G Reimer; M L Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter clinical comparison of resin-containing bottles with standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles for culture of microorganisms from blood.

Authors:  H Lelièvre; M Gimenez; F Vandenesch; A Reinhardt; D Lenhardt; H M Just; M Pau; V Ausina; J Etienne
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Diagnosis of bacteremia in whole-blood samples by use of a commercial universal 16S rRNA gene-based PCR and sequence analysis.

Authors:  Nele Wellinghausen; Anna-Julia Kochem; Claudia Disqué; Helge Mühl; Susanne Gebert; Juliane Winter; Jens Matten; Samir G Sakka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Assessment of Difco ESP 384 blood culture system by terminal subcultures: failure to detect Cryptococcus neoformans in clinical specimens.

Authors:  T J Tinghitella; M D Lamagdeleine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Direct comparison of the BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated blood culture systems for candida growth detection.

Authors:  Lynn L Horvath; Benjamin J George; Clinton K Murray; Linda S Harrison; Duane R Hospenthal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.