Literature DB >> 7612901

New modalities in breast imaging: digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

M P Braeuning1, E D Pisano.   

Abstract

Mammography is currently the only screening method available with proven capability to diagnose nonpalpable breast cancer. However, mammography does not detect all cancers. Cancers are more difficult to detect in radiographically dense breasts because lesions are obscured by breast tissue. Digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging of the breast may minimize the problems associated with screening dense breasts. If these methods prove to be useful, more cancers could be detected at an earlier stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7612901     DOI: 10.1007/BF00694742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  21 in total

1.  The positive predictive value of mammography.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; L W Bassett; R H Gold; J Zheutlin; J A Gornbein
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.

Authors:  A G Haus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Benign and malignant breast disease: magnetic resonance and radiofrequency pulse sequences.

Authors:  S J el Yousef; D M O'Connell; R H Duchesneau; M J Smith; C A Hubay; S P Guyton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  S E Harms; D P Flamig; K L Hesley; M D Meiches; R A Jensen; W P Evans; D A Savino; R V Wells
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Breast cancer missed by mammography.

Authors:  J E Martin; M Moskowitz; J R Milbrath
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  S E Harms; D P Flamig; K L Hesley; W P Evans; J H Cheek; G N Peters; S M Knox; D A Savino; G J Netto; R B Wells
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 10.  Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  P C Stomper; R S Gelman
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.