Literature DB >> 2107663

New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.

C Kimme-Smith1, L W Bassett, R H Gold, J Zheutlin, J A Gornbein.   

Abstract

Five types of film (Kodak OM, Kodak OM-SO177, Konica CM, Dupont Microvision, and Fuji MiMa) exposed in combination with seven different intensifying screens (Min R, Min R Medium, Siemens Orthox MA, Kyokka HR Mammo Fine, Agfa Gevaert Detail S (old and new), and Konica Monarch) were processed for either 90 sec (at 33.3 degrees C) or 3 min (at 35.0 degrees C). The films imaged a Computerized Imaging Reference System phantom with additional detail test objects placed on its surface to produce four groups of objects with which to evaluate resolution and contrast. For objects that tested resolution, the Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was statistically significantly superior; for objects that tested contrast, the Konica Monarch screen was statistically significantly superior. Extended processing did not affect Dupont and Kodak OM film as much as it affected the other films. It did affect contrast for the other films tested. The mean glandular doses from gridless exposures ranged from 32 to 80 mrad (0.32-0.80 mGy) over all film/screen/processing combinations for a 4.5-cm-thick test object. Several new film/screen combinations can provide images superior to the Kodak Min R/OM combination at a reduced radiation dose. The Kyokka HR Mammo Fine (Fuji) screen was found statistically superior in radiographic resolution of mammographic test objects and the Konica Monarch screen was found to be superior in defining contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2107663     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  2 in total

1.  A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications.

Authors:  D V Beard; P Bream; E D Pisano; P Conroy; R E Johnston; P Braeuning; R McLelland; R Clark
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  New modalities in breast imaging: digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M P Braeuning; E D Pisano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.