Literature DB >> 6813972

Breast cancer screening. A study in cost-effectiveness analysis.

G Mooney.   

Abstract

This paper identifies the long run average British National Health Service screening costs in one particular screening clinic for various different regimes: mammography, thermography and clinical examination; thermography and clinical examination; and mammography and clinical examination; each of these having one or two clinical examinations and the option of single or double reporting of mammograms and thermograms. It then compares the cost-effectiveness of these different regimes where 'costs' are defined widely to include not only screening costs but also biopsy costs, anxiety costs for women biopsied, costs of false negatives, etc. By defining costs in this way, it was possible (if somewhat tentatively because of the small numbers involved) to identify mammography with single reporting together with a single clinical examination as 'the best buy'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6813972     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90071-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

1.  A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz; O Even-Shoshan; S S Seshadri; I Brikman; S Kishore; H L Kundel; J S Schwartz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Prevention and the elderly: risk factors.

Authors:  R L Kane; R A Kane; S B Arnold
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.