Literature DB >> 7609481

Application of high-performance computing to numerical simulation of human movement.

F C Anderson1, J M Ziegler, M G Pandy, R T Whalen.   

Abstract

We have examined the feasibility of using massively-parallel and vector-processing supercomputers to solve large-scale optimization problems for human movement. Specifically, we compared the computational expense of determining the optimal controls for the single support phase of gait using a conventional serial machine (SGI Iris 4D25), a MIMD parallel machine (Intel iPSC/860), and a parallel-vector-processing machine (Cray Y-MP 8/864). With the human body modeled as a 14 degree-of-freedom linkage actuated by 46 musculotendinous units, computation of the optimal controls for gait could take up to 3 months of CPU time on the Iris. Both the Cray and the Intel are able to reduce this time to practical levels. The optimal solution for gait can be found with about 77 hours of CPU on the Cray and with about 88 hours of CPU on the Intel. Although the overall speeds of the Cray and the Intel were found to be similar, the unique capabilities of each machine are better suited to different portions of the computational algorithm used. The Intel was best suited to computing the derivatives of the performance criterion and the constraints whereas the Cray was best suited to parameter optimization of the controls. These results suggest that the ideal computer architecture for solving very large-scale optimal control problems is a hybrid system in which a vector-processing machine is integrated into the communication network of a MIMD parallel machine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; NASA Discipline Number 26-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7609481     DOI: 10.1115/1.2792264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  7 in total

1.  Simple and complex models for studying muscle function in walking.

Authors:  Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evaluation of parallel decomposition methods for biomechanical optimizations.

Authors:  Byung Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Benjamin J Fregly; Alan D George
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Parallel asynchronous particle swarm optimization.

Authors:  Byung-Il Koh; Alan D George; Raphael T Haftka; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Numer Methods Eng       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 3.477

4.  Parallel global optimization with the particle swarm algorithm.

Authors:  J F Schutte; J A Reinbolt; B J Fregly; R T Haftka; A D George
Journal:  Int J Numer Methods Eng       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Limitations of parallel global optimization for large-scale human movement problems.

Authors:  Byung-Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Alan D George; Raphael T Haftka; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.