Literature DB >> 17891226

Parallel global optimization with the particle swarm algorithm.

J F Schutte1, J A Reinbolt, B J Fregly, R T Haftka, A D George.   

Abstract

Present day engineering optimization problems often impose large computational demands, resulting in long solution times even on a modern high-end processor. To obtain enhanced computational throughput and global search capability, we detail the coarse-grained parallelization of an increasingly popular global search method, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Parallel PSO performance was evaluated using two categories of optimization problems possessing multiple local minima-large-scale analytical test problems with computationally cheap function evaluations and medium-scale biomechanical system identification problems with computationally expensive function evaluations. For load-balanced analytical test problems formulated using 128 design variables, speedup was close to ideal and parallel efficiency above 95% for up to 32 nodes on a Beowulf cluster. In contrast, for load-imbalanced biomechanical system identification problems with 12 design variables, speedup plateaued and parallel efficiency decreased almost linearly with increasing number of nodes. The primary factor affecting parallel performance was the synchronization requirement of the parallel algorithm, which dictated that each iteration must wait for completion of the slowest fitness evaluation. When the analytical problems were solved using a fixed number of swarm iterations, a single population of 128 particles produced a better convergence rate than did multiple independent runs performed using sub-populations (8 runs with 16 particles, 4 runs with 32 particles, or 2 runs with 64 particles). These results suggest that (1) parallel PSO exhibits excellent parallel performance under load-balanced conditions, (2) an asynchronous implementation would be valuable for real-life problems subject to load imbalance, and (3) larger population sizes should be considered when multiple processors are available.

Year:  2004        PMID: 17891226      PMCID: PMC1989676          DOI: 10.1002/nme.1149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Methods Eng        ISSN: 0029-5981            Impact factor:   3.477


  7 in total

1.  The merits of a parallel genetic algorithm in solving hard optimization problems.

Authors:  A J Knoek van Soest; L J R Richard Casius
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers.

Authors:  I Söderkvist; P A Wedin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Application of high-performance computing to numerical simulation of human movement.

Authors:  F C Anderson; J M Ziegler; M G Pandy; R T Whalen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data.

Authors:  L Chèze; B J Fregly; J Dimnet
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers.

Authors:  C W Spoor; F E Veldpaus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints.

Authors:  T W Lu; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach.

Authors:  A J van den Bogert; G D Smith; B M Nigg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.712

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of parallel decomposition methods for biomechanical optimizations.

Authors:  Byung Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Benjamin J Fregly; Alan D George
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Parallel asynchronous particle swarm optimization.

Authors:  Byung-Il Koh; Alan D George; Raphael T Haftka; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Int J Numer Methods Eng       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  Evaluation of a particle swarm algorithm for biomechanical optimization.

Authors:  Jaco F Schutte; Byung-Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Raphael T Haftka; Alan D George; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Machine Leaning-Based Optimization Algorithm for Myocardial Injury under High-Intensity Exercise in Track and Field Athletes.

Authors:  Guanguan Li
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Limitations of parallel global optimization for large-scale human movement problems.

Authors:  Byung-Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Alan D George; Raphael T Haftka; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Particle Swarm Optimisation: A Historical Review Up to the Current Developments.

Authors:  Diogo Freitas; Luiz Guerreiro Lopes; Fernando Morgado-Dias
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Non-stationary component extraction in noisy multicomponent signal using polynomial chirping Fourier transform.

Authors:  Wenlong Lu; Junwei Xie; Heming Wang; Chuan Sheng
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-26

8.  Heterogeneous computing for epidemiological model fitting and simulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kovac; Tom Haber; Frank Van Reeth; Niel Hens
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.