Literature DB >> 7609104

Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection.

M R Licht1, D K Montague, K W Angermeier, M M Lakin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determine the colony counts of organisms present on culture of clinically uninfected genitourinary prostheses at reoperation for reasons other than infection. These results served as control data for comparison with cultures from infected devices to determine the relative incidence of organisms involved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cultures were prospectively obtained from 65 penile prostheses and 22 artificial urinary sphincters. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months after reoperation or until development of infection (mean 27 months) at which time cultures were again obtained.
RESULTS: Low colony counts of Staphylococcus epidermidis were isolated from 40% of uninfected penile prostheses and 36% of artificial urinary sphincters. Only 3 of these devices later became infected (9%) and in all cases a higher colony count of another organism was found at explanation.
CONCLUSIONS: While Staph. epidermidis can cause prosthesis infection, low colony counts of the organism may not be associated with clinical infection. Therefore, the high incidence of infection attributed to this organism may be overestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7609104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of biofilm infection in urology.

Authors:  P Tenke; B Kovacs; M Jäckel; E Nagy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Conservative Therapy is an Effective Option in Patients With Localized Infection After Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Mohammed Farag; Ben Williamson; Osama Laban; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Usama Kamil; Saleh Binsaleh; Raanan Tal; David Ralph; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Update on biofilm infections in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Peter Tenke; Béla Köves; Károly Nagy; Scott J Hultgren; Werner Mendling; Björn Wullt; Magnus Grabe; Florian M E Wagenlehner; Mete Cek; Robert Pickard; Henry Botto; Kurt G Naber; Truls E Bjerklund Johansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection.

Authors:  M Cakan; F Demirel; O Karabacak; F Yalçinkaya; U Altuğ
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Surgical management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Aaron J Milbank; Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Dual implantation of penile and sphincter implants in the post-prostatectomy patient.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Penile prosthesis coating and the reduction of postoperative infection.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 8.  Updates in penile prosthesis infections.

Authors:  Amanda R Swanton; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Non-infected penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery; comparison between antibiotic coated and non - coated devices.

Authors:  Seyfettin Ciftci; Tijen Nemut; Mustafa Melih Culha; Hasan Yilmaz; Murat Ustuner; Ufuk Yavuz; Levend Ozkan; Aynur Karadenizli; Sadi Turkan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.