Literature DB >> 7607450

The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.

J F Brookfield1.   

Abstract

DNA profiling can be used to identify criminals through their DNA matching that left at the scene of a crime. The strength of the evidence supplied by a match in DNA profiles is given by the likelihood ratio. This, in turn, depends upon the probability that a match would be produced if the suspect is innocent. This probability could be strongly affected by the possibility of relatedness between the suspect and the true source of the scene-of-crime DNA profile. Methods are shown that allow for the possibility of such relatedness, arising either through population substructure or through a family relationship. Uncertainties about the likelihood ratio have been taken as grounds for the use of very conservative estimates of this quantity. The use of such conservative estimates can be shown to be neither necessary nor harmless.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607450     DOI: 10.1007/BF01441147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  22 in total

Review 1.  Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ethnic differentiation at VNTR loci, with special reference to forensic applications.

Authors:  B Devlin; N Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Effects of population structure on DNA fingerprint analysis in forensic science.

Authors:  R A Nichols; D J Balding
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 4-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Mar 7-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in blacks and Caucasians.

Authors:  N E Morton; A Collins; I Balazs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of standard error and confidence interval of estimated multilocus genotype probabilities, and their implications in DNA forensics.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; M R Srinivasan; S P Daiger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases.

Authors:  J F Brookfield
Journal:  J Forensic Sci Soc       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep

9.  How convincing is DNA evidence?

Authors:  D J Balding; P Donnelly
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; M Turner; P Debenham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.