Literature DB >> 7605513

Dynamics of unconditionally deleterious mutations: Gaussian approximation and soft selection.

A S Kondrashov1.   

Abstract

This paper studies the influence of two opposite forces, unidirectional unconditionally deleterious mutations and directional selection against them, on an amphimictic population. Mutant alleles are assumed to be equally deleterious and rare, so that homozygous mutations can be ignored. Thus, a genotype is completely described by its value with respect to a quantitative trait chi, the number of mutations it carries, while a population is described by its distribution p(chi) with mean M[p] and variance V[p] = sigma(2)[p]. When mutations are only slightly deleterious, so that M > 1, before selection p(chi) is close to Gaussian with any mode of selection. I assume that selection is soft in the sense that the fitness of a genotype depends on the difference between its value of chi and M, in units of sigma. This leads to a simple system of equations connecting the values of M and V in successive generations. This system has a unique and stable equilibrium, M = U/delta)2(2--rho) and V = (U/delta)2, where U is the genomic deleterious mutation rate, delta is the selection differential for chi in units of sigma, and rho is the ratio of variances of p(chi) after and before selection. Both delta and rho are parameters of the mode of soft selection, and do not depend on M or V. In an equilibrium population, the selection coefficient against a mutant allele is s = delta2[U(2--rho)]-1. The mutation load can be tolerable only if the genome degradation rate v = U/sigma is below 2. Other features of mutation-selection equilibrium are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7605513     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300033139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  8 in total

1.  Cumulative effects of spontaneous mutations for fitness in Caenorhabditis: role of genotype, environment and stress.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Naomi Phillips; Dejerianne Ostrow; Arián Avalos; Dustin Blanton; Ashley Boggs; Thomas Keller; Laura Levy; Edward Mezerhane
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sperm competition can drive a male-biased mutation rate.

Authors:  Justin P Blumenstiel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load.

Authors:  D Roze
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  The population genetics of synthetic lethals.

Authors:  P C Phillips; N A Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis.

Authors:  Mashaal Sohail; Olga A Vakhrusheva; Jae Hoon Sul; Sara L Pulit; Laurent C Francioli; Leonard H van den Berg; Jan H Veldink; Paul I W de Bakker; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Local fitness and epistatic effects lead to distinct patterns of linkage disequilibrium in protein-coding genes.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Synergistic epistasis of the deleterious effects of transposable elements.

Authors:  Yuh Chwen G Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Patterns and Causes of Signed Linkage Disequilibria in Flies and Plants.

Authors:  George Sandler; Stephen I Wright; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.