Literature DB >> 7602258

Investigation of the devaluation interpretation of anticipatory negative contrast.

C F Flaherty1, C Coppotelli, P S Grigson, C Mitchell, J E Flaherty.   

Abstract

Rats suppress intake of an acceptable substance (e.g., 0.15% saccharin) when it is followed by a preferred substance (e.g., 32% sucrose) in once per day pairings. The role of a learned devaluation of the initial solution in suppressed intake (anticipatory negative contrast) was investigated. The findings included the following: (a) Flavors or odors as within-subject cues precluded the occurrence of anticipatory contrast, conditioning flavor and odor preferences instead, which appeared to antagonize suppressed intake. (b) Anticipatory contrast was obtained when within-subject context cues, temporal alternation cues, or drinking-spout cues were used. (c) Preference tests conducted with the spout cues showed that devaluation of the initial substance was not necessary for the occurrence of negative anticipatory contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7602258     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.21.3.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  17 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  The role of US signal value in contingency, drug conditioning, and learned helplessness.

Authors:  M J Goddard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Microstructural analysis of negative anticipatory contrast: A reconsideration of the devaluation account.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wright; Gary Gilmour; Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Ralph Norgren; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

8.  Chemogenetic Inhibition Reveals That Processing Relative But Not Absolute Threat Requires Basal Amygdala.

Authors:  Vincent D Campese; Ian T Kim; Mian Hou; Saurav Gupta; Cassandra Draus; Botagoz Kurpas; Kelsey Burke; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Morphine-induced suppression of conditioned stimulus intake: effects of stimulus type and insular cortex lesions.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Christopher Roman; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.