Literature DB >> 7601048

The yield of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of neoplasms in the large bowel in patients with a positive Hemoccult test.

J Kewenter1, H Brevinge, B Engarås, E Haglind.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: In an ongoing screening study of 68,306 patients for early detection of colorectal cancer, those with a positive Hemoccult II test (H2) were examined with a flexible sigmoidoscope (60 cm) (FS) and double-contrast barium enema (DCE). The aim of this study was to compare the results of FS and DCE examinations in the rectum and the sigmoid colon, and to evaluate the benefit of DCEs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1831 FS and DCE examinations were performed on the basis of positive H2 tests (90% acceptance rate for positive Hemoccult tests). The radiologists were unaware of the endoscopic findings. One hundred and thirty-five patients underwent total colonoscopy due to abnormalities found on FS or DCE, or both. All patients were followed-up through various Swedish cancer registers (range: 50-145 months).
RESULTS: The sigmoidoscope was fully introduced in 71% of cases, and the mean time for the examination was 5 minutes. The combination of FS and DCE detected 235 adenomas of 1 cm and more, and 81 cancers which were in Dukes stages A (n = 29), B (n = 22), and C (n = 23). Twenty-one cancers (26%) and 24 adenomas (10%) identified on DCE were above the rectosigmoid area. The rate of overlooked adenomas (> or = 1.0 cm) and cancers was 22 and five for FS in the rectosigmoid area, and 55 and 15, respectively, for DCE. Adenomas found in the rectosigmoid area were only rarely associated with more proximal adenomas of 1 cm and more (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: This approach-screening by FS and DCE, and selective use of colonoscopy in case of abnormalities-leads to the diagnosis of significant colonic tumors (larger adenomas and cancers) in 17.7% of cases; only two of eighty-three cancers (2.4%) were overlooked with this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7601048     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1005655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

2.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

4.  Implementing screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W Atkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

5.  Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies.

Authors:  Rahime Haykir; Serdar Karakose; Aydin Karabacakoglu; Mustafa Sahin; Ertugrul Kayacetin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy and the changing distribution of colorectal cancer: implications for screening.

Authors:  K McCallion; R M Mitchell; R H Wilson; F Kee; R G Watson; J S Collins; K R Gardiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Should barium enema be the next step following an incomplete colonoscopy?

Authors:  Kevin T Kao; Michael Tam; Harpreet Sekhon; Ranjith Wijeratne; Philip I Haigh; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.