Literature DB >> 7600279

Primary chemotherapy in surgically resectable breast cancer.

G Bonadonna1, P Valagussa, R Zucali, B Salvadori.   

Abstract

We have reviewed the current status of primary chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer in view of the possibility that it may improve on results of present adjuvant drug therapies. The observed kinetic acceleration of micrometastases following noncurative surgical excision in animal studies represents strong biologic evidence supporting primary chemotherapy. From a clinical perspective, primary chemotherapy has consistently reduced the frequency of mastectomy in women with tumors initially considered too large for breast-conserving surgery. From studies of various drug combinations, it appears that the incidence of pathologic complete remission usually remains less than 10 percent. Based on results from the Milan study, it appears that the degree of tumor response is a marker of treatment outcome, at least for the first five years. A higher complete-remission rate could be expected by combining doxorubicin with paclitaxel, as has already been observed in the treatment of clinically disseminated breast cancer. In spite of the logical and scientific rationale, the available data do not as yet provide sufficient evidence to indicate a clear superiority of primary chemotherapy over adjuvant chemotherapy. The real question to answer through prospective, randomized trials is not whether the shift from adjuvant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy will result in a superior outcome, but rather how to properly integrate effective primary and adjuvant drug regimens to maximize tumor cell kill. This strategy should be further tested in patients at high risk for occult axillary adenopathy and/or distant micrometastases (i.e., tumor size larger than 2 to 3 cm). However, a more-refined risk assessment approach (e.g., using tumor grade or proliferative index) will clearly be needed. The new treatment approach may also allow for a wider use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy to obtain the primary diagnosis of cancer, a more uniform adoption of breast-conserving surgery, and use of response to chemotherapy as a marker of treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7600279     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.45.4.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  8 in total

1.  The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluation of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Amandeep Kumar; Rakesh Kumar; Vathalaru Seenu; Sidharatha Datta Gupta; Madhavi Chawla; Arun Malhotra; Sada Nand Mehta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Chariklia Giannopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 following neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Y-M Tsai; H-M Hsu; C-J Chen; K-F Hsu; H-L Fan; H Chang; D-C Chan; J-C Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Actively Targeted Deep Tissue Imaging and Photothermal-Chemo Therapy of Breast Cancer by Antibody-Functionalized Drug-Loaded X-Ray-Responsive Bismuth Sulfide@Mesoporous Silica Core-Shell Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lihua Li; Yao Lu; Chunyan Jiang; Ye Zhu; Xianfeng Yang; Xiaoming Hu; Zefeng Lin; Yu Zhang; Mingying Peng; Hong Xia; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  Discussion of relationships among changes of pathological indicators, postoperative lymphedema of the upper limb, and prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiping Zhang; Binbin Tang; Dehong Zou; Hongjian Yang; Enqi Qiao; Xiangming He; Feijiang Yu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Günter Raab; Sibylle Loibl; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Holger Eidtmann; Jörn Hilfrich; Elisabeth Merkle; Christian Jackisch; Serban D Costa; Angelika Caputo; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Amide chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T: a possible biomarker for detecting early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Erwin Krikken; Vitaliy Khlebnikov; Moritz Zaiss; Rajni A Jibodh; Paul J van Diest; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jannie P Wijnen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Treatment times in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant vs adjuvant chemotherapy: Is efficiency a benefit of preoperative chemotherapy?

Authors:  Nicole M Melchior; Darren B Sachs; Gabrielle Gauvin; Cecilia Chang; Chihsiung E Wang; Elin R Sigurdson; John M Daly; Allison A Aggon; Shelly B Hayes; Elias I Obeid; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.