Y-M Tsai1, H-M Hsu, C-J Chen, K-F Hsu, H-L Fan, H Chang, D-C Chan, J-C Yu. 1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Cheng-Kung Road, Sec. 2, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) in breast cancer with neoadjuvant therapy by using tissue biopsy and surgical specimens. METHODS: This study included 78 patients with breast cancer, who presented to our hospital between June 1999 and June 2011, and were treated with neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent mastectomy or partial mastectomy. All clinicopathological data regarding pre-neoadjuvant biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were reviewed for accuracy. The status of ER, PR, and HER2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Paired samples from 78 women (mean age 51.4 ± 11.7 years) were successfully analyzed. A switch in the status of ER was identified in 16 patients (20 %); PR, in 18 (23 %); and HER2, in 27 (35 %). There were no significant differences in the status of ER, PR, and HER2 between the primary tumor and the resected tumor after neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy does not significantly influence the status of the steroid hormone receptors and the HER2 level in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Initial biopsy may be reliable for determining the appropriate adjuvant therapy, but final pathology are still needed to evaluate the prognosis and provided the alternative treatment when tumor recurrence. Further prospective study is needed to optimize the care available for breast cancer patients.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and humanepidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) in breast cancer with neoadjuvant therapy by using tissue biopsy and surgical specimens. METHODS: This study included 78 patients with breast cancer, who presented to our hospital between June 1999 and June 2011, and were treated with neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent mastectomy or partial mastectomy. All clinicopathological data regarding pre-neoadjuvant biopsy and definitive surgical specimens were reviewed for accuracy. The status of ER, PR, and HER2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Paired samples from 78 women (mean age 51.4 ± 11.7 years) were successfully analyzed. A switch in the status of ER was identified in 16 patients (20 %); PR, in 18 (23 %); and HER2, in 27 (35 %). There were no significant differences in the status of ER, PR, and HER2 between the primary tumor and the resected tumor after neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy does not significantly influence the status of the steroid hormone receptors and the HER2 level in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Initial biopsy may be reliable for determining the appropriate adjuvant therapy, but final pathology are still needed to evaluate the prognosis and provided the alternative treatment when tumor recurrence. Further prospective study is needed to optimize the care available for breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: T J Powles; T F Hickish; A Makris; S E Ashley; M E O'Brien; V A Tidy; S Casey; A G Nash; N Sacks; D Cosgrove Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Nicolini; R Giardino; A Carpi; P Ferrari; L Anselmi; S Colosimo; M Conte; M Fini; G Giavaresi; P Berti; P Miccoli Journal: Biomed Pharmacother Date: 2006-08-28 Impact factor: 6.529
Authors: T Hirata; C Shimizu; K Yonemori; A Hirakawa; T Kouno; K Tamura; M Ando; N Katsumata; Y Fujiwara Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Susanne Taucher; Margaretha Rudas; Robert M Mader; Michael Gnant; Peter Dubsky; Sebastian Roka; Thomas Bachleitner; Daniela Kandioler; Günther Steger; Martina Mittlböck; Raimund Jakesz Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2004-01-31 Impact factor: 2.275
Authors: Tatiana A Bogush; Anna A Basharina; Elena A Bogush; Alexander M Scherbakov; Mikhail M Davydov; Vyacheslav S Kosorukov Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 2.089