Literature DB >> 7596742

Precue effects in visual search: data or resource limited?

R A Kinchla1, Z Chen, D Evert.   

Abstract

Precuing an observer as to where a target is more likely to occur in a subsequent visual array can increase the detectability (d') of a target at that location. This is often attributed to the observer's increased allocation of some limited cognitive resource ("attention") to the cued location. Two experiments are reported which are difficult to interpret in this way even though they involve similar cue effects. The first involves postcuing a location well after the array but before the observer responds, so that the cue can influence the response but not the observation. The second involves precuing, but with slow sequential presentation of array elements prior to the response, so the observer need not share any limited resource while processing each element in turn. Enhanced detectability similar to that produced with precues and simultaneous presentation of elements is shown to occur in each experiment. An alternative data-limited (rather than resource-limited) interpretation of these effects is provided by a mathematical model in which the observer integrates equally noisy or degraded internal representations of the array elements, but gives more weight to cued elements in selecting a response. Theoretical parameters of the model are shown to provide separate measures of both an observer's overall sensitivity and precue effects in cost-benefit analyses of cuing data.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7596742     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

Review 1.  Attention.

Authors:  R A Kinchla
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; S A Hillyard; S J Luck; M Mouloua; C J Downing; D P Woodward
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Locus and persistence of capacity limitations in visual information processing.

Authors:  J A Kleiss; D M Lane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J D St James
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-10

6.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention.

Authors:  H J Müller; J M Findlay
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-10

7.  A two-stage model of visual search.

Authors:  J E Hoffman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

8.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; G T Gardner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-04

Review 9.  Strategies and models of selective attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions.

Authors:  V Gourevitch; E Galanter
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  19 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  A common computational process in cueing and conjunction search tasks.

Authors:  KangWoo Lee; Hyunseung Choo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-11-22

4.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  The offline stream of conscious representations.

Authors:  Claire Sergent
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Optimization of computed tomography protocols: limitations of a methodology employing a phantom with location-known opacities.

Authors:  Karen L Dobeli; Sarah J Lewis; Steven R Meikle; David L Thiele; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Specific Visual Subregions of TPJ Mediate Reorienting of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Attention trades off spatial acuity.

Authors:  Barbara Montagna; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.