Literature DB >> 24023371

Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Kaylah Lalonde, Rachael Frush Holt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This preliminary investigation explored potential cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination by using the toddler change/ no-change procedure and examined whether modifications would result in a procedure that can be used consistently with younger 2-year-olds.
METHOD: Twenty typically developing 2-year-olds completed the newly modified toddler change/no-change procedure. Behavioral tests and parent report questionnaires were used to measure several cognitive and linguistic constructs. Stepwise linear regression was used to relate discrimination sensitivity to the cognitive and linguistic measures. In addition, discrimination results from the current experiment were compared with those from 2-year-old children tested in a previous experiment.
RESULTS: Receptive vocabulary and working memory explained 56.6% of variance in discrimination performance. Performance was not different on the modified toddler change/no-change procedure used in the current experiment from in a previous investigation, which used the original version of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between speech discrimination and receptive vocabulary and working memory provides further evidence that the procedure is sensitive to the strength of perceptual representations. The role for working memory might also suggest that there are specific subject-related, nonsensory factors limiting the applicability of the procedure to children who have not reached the necessary levels of cognitive and linguistic development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24023371      PMCID: PMC5600153          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0227)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  72 in total

1.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; T L Nichols
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral pattern discrimination by children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-02

3.  Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity.

Authors:  T E Hnath-Chisolm; E Laipply; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children.

Authors:  M A Reed
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-10

5.  Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children.

Authors:  J F Werker; R C Tees
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-03

6.  Specific cognitive abilities in 2-year-old children with subependymal and mild intraventricular hemorrhage.

Authors:  G Ross; S Boatright; P A Auld; R Nass
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Bootstrapping conceptual deduction using physical connection: rethinking frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Perception of stop consonants in children with expressive and receptive-expressive language impairments.

Authors:  R E Stark; J M Heinz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-08

9.  Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Tsao; Huei-Mei Liu; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preschoolers benefit from visually salient speech cues.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Audiovisual speech perception development at varying levels of perceptual processing.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Detection and Attention for Auditory, Visual, and Audiovisual Speech in Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Cassandra Karl; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Aggressive Behaviors in Young Siblings: Associations with Executive Functions and Maternal Characteristics.

Authors:  Catherine A Spann; Jeffrey R Gagne
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-04

6.  Speech-in-speech recognition in preschoolers.

Authors:  Christina Dubas; Heather Porter; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.437

7.  Visual speech fills in both discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Rachel P McAlpine; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2017-07-20

8.  Longitudinal Speech Recognition in Noise in Children: Effects of Hearing Status and Vocabulary.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; Caitlin Sapp; Jacob J Oleson; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.