Literature DB >> 7588482

Using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships to examine estrogen receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls.

C L Waller1, D L Minor, J D McKinney.   

Abstract

Certain phenyl-substituted hydrocarbons of environmental concern have the potential to disrupt the endocrine system of animals, apparently in association with their estrogenic properties. Competition with natural estrogens for the estrogen receptor is a possible mechanism by which such effects could occur. We used comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) paradigm, to examine the underlying structural properties of ortho-chlorinated hydroxybiphenyl analogs known to bind to the estrogen receptor. The cross-validated and conventional statistical results indicate a high degree of internal predictability for the molecules included in the training data set. In addition to the phenolic (A) ring system, conformational restriction of the overall structure appears to play an important role in estrogen receptor binding affinity. Hydrophobic character as assessed using hydropathic interaction fields also contributes in a positive way to binding affinity. The CoMFA-derived QSARs may be useful in examining the estrogenic activity of a wider range of phenyl-substituted hydrocarbons of environmental concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7588482      PMCID: PMC1522195          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  18 in total

1.  A theoretical study of the binding of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzodioxins, and dibenzofuran to human plasma prealbumin.

Authors:  L G Pedersen; T A Darden; S J Oatley; J D McKinney
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Clinical and reproductive effects of Clophen A50 (PCB) administered during gestation on pregnant guinea pigs and their offspring.

Authors:  U Lundkvist
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1990-04-30       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Estrogenic action of DDT and its analogs.

Authors:  R M Welch; W Levin; A H Conney
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Biochemical pharmacology of antiestrogen action.

Authors:  V C Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  S H Safe
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Diethylstilbestrol metabolites and analogs. Biochemical probes for differential stimulation of uterine estrogen responses.

Authors:  K S Korach; C Fox-Davies; V E Quarmby; M H Swaisgood
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1985-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Estrogenic activities of chlorinated hydrocarbons.

Authors:  J A Nelson; R F Struck; R James
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1978 Mar-May

8.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships/comparative molecular field analysis (QSAR/CoMFA) for receptor-binding properties of halogenated estradiol derivatives.

Authors:  T G Gantchev; H Ali; J E van Lier
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Estrogen receptor-binding activity of polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls: conformationally restricted structural probes.

Authors:  K S Korach; P Sarver; K Chae; J A McLachlan; J D McKinney
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 10.  Polychlorinated biphenyls as hormonally active structural analogues.

Authors:  J D McKinney; C L Waller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  15 in total

1.  Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods.

Authors:  W Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Antiestrogenic activity of anthropogenic and natural chemicals.

Authors:  J M Navas; H Segner
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mammary carcinogen-protein binding potentials: novel and biologically relevant structure-activity relationship model descriptors.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; S Qamar; C A Carrasquer; P A Holt; J M Maguire; S L Cunningham; J O Trent
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Examination of the estrogenicity of 2,4,6,2',6'-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 104), its hydroxylated metabolite 2,4,6,2',6'-pentachloro-4-biphenylol (HO-PCB 104), and a further chlorinated derivative, 2,4,6,2',4',6'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB 155).

Authors:  M R Fielden; I Chen; B Chittim; S H Safe; T R Zacharewski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Assessing chemicals for estrogenic/hormone-disrupting properties: lessons from carcinogenicity assessment.

Authors:  J Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: predictions across species.

Authors:  W Tong; R Perkins; R Strelitz; E R Collantes; S Keenan; W J Welsh; W S Branham; D M Sheehan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  R J Kavlock; G P Daston; C DeRosa; P Fenner-Crisp; L E Gray; S Kaattari; G Lucier; M Luster; M J Mac; C Maczka; R Miller; J Moore; R Rolland; G Scott; D M Sheehan; T Sinks; H A Tilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife.

Authors:  M Van den Berg; L Birnbaum; A T Bosveld; B Brunström; P Cook; M Feeley; J P Giesy; A Hanberg; R Hasegawa; S W Kennedy; T Kubiak; J C Larsen; F X van Leeuwen; A K Liem; C Nolt; R E Peterson; L Poellinger; S Safe; D Schrenk; D Tillitt; M Tysklind; M Younes; F Waern; T Zacharewski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.