Literature DB >> 10921772

Receptor-based 3D QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands--merging the accuracy of receptor-based alignments with the computational efficiency of ligand-based methods.

W Sippl1.   

Abstract

One of the major challenges in computational approaches to drug design is the accurate prediction of binding affinity of biomolecules. In the present study several prediction methods for a published set of estrogen receptor ligands are investigated and compared. The binding modes of 30 ligands were determined using the docking program AutoDock and were compared with available X-ray structures of estrogen receptor-ligand complexes. On the basis of the docking results an interaction energy-based model, which uses the information of the whole ligand-receptor complex, was generated. Several parameters were modified in order to analyze their influence onto the correlation between binding affinities and calculated ligand-receptor interaction energies. The highest correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.617, q2Loo = 0.570) was obtained considering protein flexibility during the interaction energy evaluation. The second prediction method uses a combination of receptor-based and 3D quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D QSAR) methods. The ligand alignment obtained from the docking simulations was taken as basis for a comparative field analysis applying the GRID/GOLPE program. Using the interaction field derived with a water probe and applying the smart region definition (SRD) variable selection, a significant and robust model was obtained (r2 = 0.991, q2LOO = 0.921). The predictive ability of the established model was further evaluated by using a test set of six additional compounds. The comparison with the generated interaction energy-based model and with a traditional CoMFA model obtained using a ligand-based alignment (r2 = 0.951, q2L00 = 0.796) indicates that the combination of receptor-based and 3D QSAR methods is able to improve the quality of the underlying model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10921772     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008115913787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  35 in total

1.  Comparative molecular field analysis and energy interaction studies of thrombin-inhibitor complexes.

Authors:  R Bursi; P D Grootenhuis
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Scoring functions: a view from the bench.

Authors:  J R Tame
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery.

Authors:  I D Kuntz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Ligand-protein docking and rational drug design.

Authors:  T P Lybrand
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  A structural and energetics analysis of the binding of a series of N-acetylneuraminic-acid-based inhibitors to influenza virus sialidase.

Authors:  N R Taylor; M von Itzstein
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Smart region definition: a new way to improve the predictive ability and interpretability of three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  M Pastor; G Cruciani; S Clementi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1997-05-09       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Comparative molecular field analysis using GRID force-field and GOLPE variable selection methods in a study of inhibitors of glycogen phosphorylase b.

Authors:  G Cruciani; K A Watson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-08-05       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of steroid aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  T I Oprea; A E García
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens.

Authors:  C L Waller; T I Oprea; K Chae; H K Park; K S Korach; S C Laws; T E Wiese; W R Kelce; L E Gray
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  On the prediction of binding properties of drug molecules by comparative molecular field analysis.

Authors:  G Klebe; U Abraham
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1993-01-08       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  14 in total

1.  CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands.

Authors:  Peter Wolohan; David E Reichert
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Structure-based prediction of free energy changes of binding of PTP1B inhibitors.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Shek Ling Chan; Kal Ramnarayan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  A validation study on the practical use of automated de novo design.

Authors:  Martin Stahl; Nikolay P Todorov; Tim James; Harald Mauser; Hans-Joachim Boehm; Philip M Dean
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Development of biologically active compounds by combining 3D QSAR and structure-based design methods.

Authors:  Wolfgang Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Pharmacophore search for anti-fertility and estrogenic potencies of estrogen analogs.

Authors:  Sk Mahasin Alam; Ria Pal; Shuchi Nagar; Md Ataul Islam; Achintya Saha
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands.

Authors:  Stefano Costanzi; Irina G Tikhonova; T Kendall Harden; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Multiple receptor conformation docking and dock pose clustering as tool for CoMFA and CoMSIA analysis - a case study on HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Sree Kanth Sivan; Vijjulatha Manga
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Structure-based 3D QSAR and design of novel acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  W Sippl; J M Contreras; I Parrot; Y M Rival; C G Wermuth
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  SAR comparative studies on pyrimido[4,5-b][1,4] benzothiazine derivatives as 15-lipoxygenase inhibitors, using ab initio calculations.

Authors:  Mehdi Bakavoli; Hamid Sadeghian; Zahra Tabatabaei; Elham Rezaei; Mohammad Rahimizadeh; Mohsen Nikpour
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  A structure-activity relationship study of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors combining molecular docking and 3D QSAR methods.

Authors:  Anu J Tervo; Tommi H Nyrönen; Toni Rönkkö; Antti Poso
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.