Literature DB >> 7580401

Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing.

S Johannes1, T F Münte, H J Heinze, G R Mangun.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from healthy subjects in response to unilaterally flashed high and low luminance bar stimuli presented randomly to left and right field locations. Their task was to covertly and selectively attend to either the left or right stimulus locations (separate blocks) in order to detect infrequent shorter target bars of either luminance. Independent of attention, higher stimulus luminance resulted in higher ERP amplitudes for the posterior N95 (80-110 ms), occipital P1 (110-140 ms), and parietal N1 (130-180 ms). Brighter stimuli also resulted in shorter peak latency for the occipital N1 component (135-220 ms); this effect was not observed for the N1 components over parietal, central or frontal regions. Significant attention-related amplitude modulations were obtained for the occipital P1, occipital, parietal and central N1, the occipital and parietal P2, and the parietal N2 components; these components were larger to stimuli at the attended location. In contrast to the relatively short latencies of both spatial attention and luminance effects, the first interaction between luminance and spatial attention effects was observed for the P3 component to the target stimuli (350-750 ms). This suggests that interactions of spatial attention and stimulus luminance previously reported for reaction time measures may not reflect the earliest stages of sensory/perceptual processing. Differences in the way in which luminance and attention affected the occipital P1, occipital N1 and parietal N1 components suggest dissociations among these ERPs in the mechanisms of visual and attentional processing they reflect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580401     DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)90008-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  79 in total

1.  Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Siri-Maria Kamp; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.

Authors:  Grace Lai; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Dissociation of early evoked cortical activity in perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Sergei Gepshtein; Michael Kubovy; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Early dissociation of face and object processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Elina Pihko; Jussi Nurminen; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  L Anllo-Vento; S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Differential functional roles of slow-wave and oscillatory-α activity in visual sensory cortex during anticipatory visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; C Nicolas Boehler; J Leon Kenemans; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.