Literature DB >> 7579503

Recurrence-free survival in breast cancer improved by adjuvant tamoxifen--especially for progesterone receptor positive tumors with a high proliferation.

M Fernö1, B Baldetorp, P O Bendahl, A Borg, S B Ewers, H Olsson, S Rydén, H Sigurdsson, D Killander.   

Abstract

Although the beneficial effect on breast cancer of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) is well established, in the series studied by our group this effect seems to have been restricted to patients with steroid receptor (especially progesterone receptor (PgR)) positive tumors. However, as some patients with PgR-positive tumors manifested recurrence despite adjuvant TAM treatment, the question arose whether some other biological factor(s) could be used to identify these non-responding cases. The level of the S-phase fraction (SPF), as measured by flow cytometry, has been shown to be a useful prognostic marker, prognosis being better in cases where the SPF is low than in those where it is high. The aim of the present study was to relate the prognosis after adjuvant TAM to SPF among patients with PgR-positive tumors. In the PgR-positive group as a whole, the effect of TAM on prognosis was more pronounced in the high SPF group than in the low SPF group (p = 0.005) the respective decrease in 3 year recurrence rate was from 19 to 43% and from 17 to 9%. Multivariate analysis of the data for the TAM-treated group showed the level of PgR concentration (low positive vs. high positive), lymph node status, and tumor size to be independent predictive factors, but not the level of SPF (i.e. high vs. low). By contrast, among patients not treated with TAM, the SPF was a strong independent prognostic factor. To sum up, SPF was a strong independent predictor of outcome only for patients receiving no systemic adjuvant therapy, but not in patients receiving adjuvant TAM. Patients with PgR-positive and high S-phase tumors derived more benefit from TAM than patients with PgR-positive and low SPF tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7579503     DOI: 10.1007/BF00690181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  33 in total

1.  Statistical evaluation of cell kinetic data from DNA flow cytometry (FCM) by the EM algorithm.

Authors:  B Baldetorp; M Dalberg; U Holst; G Lindgren
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-11

2.  Picogram per cell determination of DNA by flow cytofluorometry.

Authors:  G M Lee; J T Thornthwaite; E M Rasch
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Correlation of pretreatment proliferative activity of breast cancer with the response to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Y Remvikos; P Beuzeboc; A Zajdela; N Voillemot; H Magdelénat; P Pouillart
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Indicators of prognosis in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  H Sigurdsson; B Baldetorp; A Borg; M Dalberg; M Fernö; D Killander; H Olsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Beneficial effect of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients with high oestrogen receptor values.

Authors:  C Rose; S M Thorpe; K W Andersen; B V Pedersen; H T Mouridsen; M Blichert-Toft; B B Rasmussen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  3H-thymidine incorporation into mammary carcinoma cells obtained by needle aspiration before and during endocrine therapy.

Authors:  B Nordenskjöld; T Löwhagen; H Westerberg; J Zajicek
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

7.  Mechanisms of growth inhibition by nonsteroidal antioestrogens in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  R L Sutherland; C K Watts; R E Hall; P C Ruenitz
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.292

8.  Hormone sensitivity in breast cancer: influence of heterogeneity of oestrogen receptor expression and cell proliferation.

Authors:  R I Nicholson; N Bouzubar; K J Walker; R McClelland; A R Dixon; J F Robertson; I O Ellis; R W Blamey
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Controlled trial of tamoxifen as a single adjuvant agent in the management of early breast cancer. 'Nolvadex' Adjuvant Trial Organisation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Flow cytometry in primary breast cancer: improving the prognostic value of the fraction of cells in the S-phase by optimal categorisation of cut-off levels.

Authors:  H Sigurdsson; B Baldetorp; A Borg; M Dalberg; M Fernö; D Killander; H Olsson; J Ranstam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Membrane estrogen signaling enhances tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of breast cancer cells via estrogen receptor-α36 (ERα36).

Authors:  Reyhaan A Chaudhri; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Natalia Cuenca; Agreen Hadadi; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomised premenopausal breast cancer trial.

Authors:  K Jirström; L Rydén; L Anagnostaki; B Nordenskjöld; O Stål; S Thorstenson; G Chebil; P-E Jönsson; M Fernö; G Landberg
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Global H3K27 trimethylation and EZH2 abundance in breast tumor subtypes.

Authors:  Karolina Holm; Dorthe Grabau; Kristina Lövgren; Steina Aradottir; Sofia Gruvberger-Saal; Jillian Howlin; Lao H Saal; Stephen P Ethier; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Olle Stål; Per Malmström; Mårten Fernö; Lisa Rydén; Cecilia Hegardt; Åke Borg; Markus Ringnér
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Polypoid endometriosis: a mimic of malignancy.

Authors:  Soleen Ghafoor; Yulia Lakhman; Kay J Park; Iva Petkovska
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  Molecular markers for predicting response to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D R Ciocca; R Elledge
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.925

7.  A Hybrid Computer-aided-diagnosis System for Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence (HPBCR) Using Optimized Ensemble Learning.

Authors:  Mohammad R Mohebian; Hamid R Marateb; Marjan Mansourian; Miguel Angel Mañanas; Fariborz Mokarian
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Arrabidaea chica chloroform extract modulates estrogen and androgen receptors on luminal breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Douglas C Brandão; Paula M A P Lima; Isabella C Martins; Carina S Cordeiro; Antonielle O Cordeiro; Lara Vecchi; Joyce F C Guerra; Priscila C Orsolin; Matheus C Gazolla; Danilo S Costa; Ademar A da Silva Filho; Thaise G Araújo
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2022-01-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.