Literature DB >> 24254020

Ethanol tolerances of Drosophila melanogaster populations selected on different concentrations of ethanol supplemented media.

J G Oakeshott1, F M Cohan, J B Gibson.   

Abstract

Eight recently collected Australasian populations of D. melanogaster were each divided into eight selection lines. Two of these lines from each population were maintained on one of four types of selection media: standard food supplemented with 0%, 3%, 6% and 9% ethanol. After 30 generations the selection lines were tested for tolerance to 9% ethanol medium and after another 20 generations adults were tested for tolerance to concentrated ethanol fumes. Significant differences in tolerance were found among lines selected on different media which were consistent across the eight populations. On the 9% test media, the 6% and 9% selection lines, as compared with the control lines selected on 0% ethanol, were more likely to survive as pre-adults or adults, faster to develop as preadults, and heavier and more productive as adults. However, the tolerance of the 3% lines to the 9% test media was less than that of the 0% control lines in preadult and adult survival, intermediate between that of the 0% and the 6% and 9% lines in productivities, and apparently superior to the 6% and 9% lines in development times and adult weights. The 3%, 6% and 9% lines showed similar tolerances to the ethanol vapour. Previous work showed that 3% ethanol can be a metabolic benefit to D. melanogaster but 6% and 9% are metabolic costs. The present results suggest that the phenotype selected on 3% to obtain a metabolic benefit differs in many respects from that selected on 6% and 9% to minimise their detrimental effects.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24254020     DOI: 10.1007/BF00251111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  7 in total

1.  Genetic variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to environmental variation: Ethanol levels in breeding sites and allozyme frequencies.

Authors:  J B Gibson; T W May; A V Wilks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Selective effects of the genetic background and ethanol on the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J G Oakeshott; J B Gibson; S R Wilson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Extension of longevity in Drosophila mojavensis by environmental ethanol: differences between subraces.

Authors:  W T Starmer; W B Heed; E S Rockwood-Sluss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selection for ethanol tolerance in two populations of Drosophila melanogaster segregating alcohol dehydrogenase allozymes.

Authors:  J B Gibson; N Lewis; M A Adena; S R Wilson
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1979-06

5.  LATITUDINAL CLINE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER FOR KNOCKDOWN RESISTANCE TO ETHANOL FUMES AND FOR RATES OF RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR FURTHER RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Frederick M Cohan; Jean-Daniel Graf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  [Genetic tolerance to alcohol in Drosophila: comparison of the effects of selection in D. melanogaster and D. simulans].

Authors:  J David; C Bocquet; P Fouillet; M F Arens
Journal:  C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D       Date:  1977-09-12

7.  Alcohol tolerance and alcohol utilisation in Drosophila: partial independence of two adaptive traits.

Authors:  J Van Herrewege; J R David
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.821

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Physiological genetics of the response to a high-sucrose diet by Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Wang; A G Clark
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Phenotypic and genetic effects of contrasting ethanol environments on physiological and developmental traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Luis E Castañeda; Roberto F Nespolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.