Literature DB >> 7573257

The association between occupational factors and preterm birth: a United States nurses' study. Research Committee of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses.

B Luke1, N Mamelle, L Keith, F Munoz, J Minogue, E Papiernik, T R Johnson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate factors associated with preterm birth among a national sample of U.S. nurses. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a case-control study of 210 nurses whose infants were delivered prematurely (< 37 weeks) (cases) and 1260 nurses whose infants were delivered at term (> or = 37 weeks) (controls). An occupational fatigue score was constructed from four sources and varied from 0 to 4. The relation between occupational activity (including hours working and fatigue score) and preterm birth was analyzed with the use of Pearson chi 2 tests, estimates of odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and multivariate logistic regression; we controlled for confounding factors.
RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with preterm birth included hours worked per week (p < 0.002), per shift (p < 0.001), and while standing (p < 0.001); noise (p = 0.005); physical exertion (p = 0.01); and occupational fatigue score (p < 0.002). The adjusted odds ratios were 1.6 (p = 0.006) for hours worked per week (< or = 36 vs > 36) and 1.4 (p = 0.02) for fatigue score < 3 vs > or = 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth among working women may be related to hours worked per day or week and to adverse working conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7573257     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90354-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  23 in total

1.  Preterm Delivery Risk in Relation to Maternal Occupational and Leisure Time Physical Activity Among Thai Women.

Authors:  Kailey Nelson; Vitool Lohsoonthorn; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Asian Biomed (Res Rev News)       Date:  2009-06

2.  The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico City: the effects of working conditions and antenatal leave.

Authors:  P Cerón-Mireles; S D Harlow; C I Sánchez-Carrillo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The cost of prematurity: a case-control study of twins vs singletons.

Authors:  B Luke; H R Bigger; S Leurgans; D Sietsema
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Maternal work and birth outcome disparities.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman; Paula K Diehr
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-15

6.  Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcomes in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort.

Authors:  I Niedhammer; D O'Mahony; S Daly; J J Morrison; C C Kelleher
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D M van Beukering; M J G J van Melick; B W Mol; M H W Frings-Dresen; C T J Hulshof
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  The use of psychosocial stress scales in preterm birth research.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; William A Grobman; Jackie K Gollan; Ann E B Borders
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Exercise during the childbearing year.

Authors:  R L Hammer; J Perkins; R Parr
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2000

10.  Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey.

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; J Zeitlin; N Lelong; E Papiernik; G C Di Renzo; G Bréart
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.