Literature DB >> 8659657

The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico City: the effects of working conditions and antenatal leave.

P Cerón-Mireles1, S D Harlow, C I Sánchez-Carrillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of working conditions, occupational stress, and antenatal leave on risk of small-for-gestational age and premature births in Mexico City.
METHODS: Over a 3-month period, 2663 (96.2%) of 2767 women who gave birth at three major hospitals and worked at least 3 months during pregnancy were interviewed shortly after delivery. After the exclusion of multiple gestations and birth defects, 261 (10.0%) small-for-gestational-age and 288 (11.0%) preterm births were identified.
RESULTS: For small-for-gestational-age births, working more than 50 hours a week (odds ratio [OR] = 1.59), standing more than 7 hours a day (OR = 1.40), and no antenatal leave (OR = 1.55) were associated with an increased risk. Women with no antenatal leave were also much more likely to give birth prematurely (OR = 3.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, arduous working conditions and lack of antenatal leave benefits were found to increase the risk of poor birth outcome in Mexican women. Enforcement of existing antenatal leave laws and provision of comparable benefits for the uninsured may reduce the incidence of small-for-gestational-age births and prematurity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8659657      PMCID: PMC1380402          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.6.825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  20 in total

1.  Pregnant women at work: rest periods to prevent preterm birth?

Authors:  N Mamelle; I Bertucat; F Munoz
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 2.  Work in pregnancy: its evolving relationship with perinatal outcome (a review).

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; M Kaminski
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Pregnant women's working conditions and their changes during pregnancy: a national study in France.

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; M Kaminski
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1987-04

4.  Employment in pregnancy: prevalence, maternal characteristics, perinatal outcome.

Authors:  J F Murphy; M Dauncey; R Newcombe; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Prematurity and occupational activity during pregnancy.

Authors:  N Mamelle; B Laumon; P Lazar
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Influence of work during pregnancy on fetal weight.

Authors:  A Alegre; F J Rodriguez-Escudero; E Cruz; M Prada
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Maternal work during pregnancy in traditional societies.

Authors:  A Briend
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Effects of maternal undernutrition and heavy physical work during pregnancy on birth weight.

Authors:  N Tafari; R L Naeye; A Gobezie
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-03

10.  Pregnancy and its outcome among hospital personnel according to occupation and working conditions.

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; M Kaminski; J Llado-Arkhipoff; C Du Mazaubrun; M Estryn-Behar; C Berthier; M Mouchet; C Kelfa
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  25 in total

1.  Continuing the debate on the philosophy of modern public health: social quality as a point of reference.

Authors:  L J van der Maesen; H G Nijhuis
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Association of maternal work with adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Mostafa A Arafa; Taher Amine; Moataz Abdel Fattah
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun

3.  Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcomes in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort.

Authors:  I Niedhammer; D O'Mahony; S Daly; J J Morrison; C C Kelleher
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Physically demanding work and preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M D M van Beukering; M J G J van Melick; B W Mol; M H W Frings-Dresen; C T J Hulshof
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  The use of psychosocial stress scales in preterm birth research.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; William A Grobman; Jackie K Gollan; Ann E B Borders
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J G J van Melick; M D M van Beukering; B W Mol; M H W Frings-Dresen; C T J Hulshof
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Socioeconomic and work related determinants of pregnancy outcome in southern Thailand.

Authors:  P Tuntiseranee; J Olsen; V Chongsuvivatwong; S Limbutara
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Construction of early and midlife work trajectories in women and their association with birth weight.

Authors:  Miriam Mutambudzi; John D Meyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities in low birth weight delivery associated with maternal occupational characteristics.

Authors:  John D Meyer; Nicholas Warren; Susan Reisine
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Physical hazards in employment and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Bratati Banerjee
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.