Literature DB >> 7572310

Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip, and forearm: a human cadaver study.

O L Svendsen1, C Hassager, V Skødt, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

The impact of soft tissue in vivo on accuracy of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the spine and hip by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and of the forearm by single photon absorptiometry was assessed by use of 14 human cadavers. The in vivo accuracy errors (SEE%) were: forearm 3-5%, anteroposterior spine 5.3%, lateral spine 10-12%, and femoral greater trochanter, neck, total, intertrochanteric, and Ward's triangle 3%, 6.5%, 6.7%, 8%, and 11-13%, respectively. Except from the lateral spine and the greater trochanter, the slopes of the linear regressions of in vivo BMD against in vitro BMD were not significantly different from 1 (p > 0.05). The calculated random accuracy error of BMD measurements due to fat inhomogeneity was estimated to 3-4% for the anteroposterior spine and 9-14% for the lateral spine (from abdominal computed tomography in 26 healthy women). In conclusion, acceptable accuracy errors below 6-7% (of soft tissue in vivo) of BMD measurements were obtained in the anteroposterior spine, the forearm, and the neck, greater trochanter, and total proximal femur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7572310     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  29 in total

1.  Body mass index and bone loss among postmenopausal women: the 10-year follow-up of the OSTPRE cohort.

Authors:  Jarmo Saarelainen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Heikki Kröger; Marjo Tuppurainen; Leo Niskanen; Jukka Jurvelin; Risto Honkanen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Which bone densitometry and which skeletal site are clinically useful for monitoring bone mass?

Authors:  Masako Ito; Akifumi Nishida; Jun Kono; Mika Kono; Masataka Uetani; Kuniaki Hayashi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Karim M Khan; Kathy Keiver; Jason B Chew; Heather A McKay; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Assessing bone mass in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Tishya A L Wren; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  The influence of exogenous fat and water on lumbar spine bone mineral density in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kyu-Nam Kim; Bom-Taeck Kim; Kwang-Min Kim; Sat-Byul Park; Nam-Seok Joo; Sang Hyeon Je; Young-Sang Kim; Duck-Joo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

6.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  J A Clowes; N F A Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  The European spine phantom: reply to Dr Peter Tothill's letter.

Authors:  J Reeve; M Lunt; W Kalender; J Dequeker; I Jajic; R Lorenc; H Pols; G Poor; J Stepan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: comparison with hip and forearm measurement.

Authors:  K Bjarnason; C Hassager; O L Svendsen; H Stang; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.