Literature DB >> 7562040

Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays.

F Dehdashti1, J E Mortimer, B A Siegel, L K Griffeth, T J Bonasera, M J Fusselman, D D Detert, P D Cutler, J A Katzenellenbogen, M J Welch.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to assess the results of PET with 16 alpha-[18F]fluoro-17 beta-estradiol (FES) and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) to validate the concordance between tumor estrogen-receptor (ER) status as determined by FES-PET and in vitro assays and to assess the relationship between tumor metabolic activity determined by FDG-PET and tumor ER status, both of which may provide information about tumor aggressiveness and prognosis.
METHODS: We studied 32 patients with primary breast masses and 21 patients with clinical or radiological evidence of recurrent/metastatic breast carcinoma. A diagnosis of breast carcinoma was subsequently proven in 43 patients (24 primary, 15 metastatic and 4 recurrent tumors). In vitro assessment of ER status was available for 40 malignant lesions (23 primary and 17 metastatic/recurrent). The patients underwent PET with both FES and FDG, and the uptake of each tracer within each lesion was evaluated qualitatively as well as semiquantitatively using the standardized-uptake-value (SUV) method.
RESULTS: We found good overall agreement (88%) between in vitro ER assays and FES-PET. This degree of agreement is similar to that observed between replicate in vitro assays (with discordances due to interlaboratory, interassay and specimen variability). We were, however, unable to demonstrate any significant relationship between tumor FDG uptake and ER status or between tumor FDG and tumor FES uptake in these patients.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that in vitro ER assays and/or FES-PET provide unique direct information about breast cancer ER status that cannot be obtained indirectly by FDG-PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7562040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  61 in total

1.  Small-animal PET of steroid hormone receptors predicts tumor response to endocrine therapy using a preclinical model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy M Fowler; Szeman Ruby Chan; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Dong Zhou; Carmen S Dence; Kathryn E Carlson; M Jeyakumar; John A Katzenellenbogen; Robert D Schreiber; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 3.  Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; William B Eubank
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 4.  Targeted functional imaging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Imaging readouts as biomarkers or surrogate parameters for the assessment of therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Markus Rudin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kristen A Wangerin; Mark Muzi; Lanell M Peterson; Hannah M Linden; Alena Novakova; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Immuno-positron emission tomography in cancer models.

Authors:  Smitha Reddy; Matthew K Robinson
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  Molecular imaging to guide systemic cancer therapy: Illustrative examples of PET imaging cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 9.  Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivier Couturier; André Luxen; Jean-François Chatal; Jean-Philippe Vuillez; Pierre Rigo; Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Assessment of the novel estrogen receptor PET tracer 4-fluoro-11β-methoxy-16α-[(18)F]fluoroestradiol (4FMFES) by PET imaging in a breast cancer murine model.

Authors:  Michel Paquette; Serge Phoenix; René Ouellet; Réjean Langlois; Johan E van Lier; Eric E Turcotte; Francois Bénard; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.