UNLABELLED: Estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) are expressed in most human breast cancers and are important predictive factors for directing therapy. Because of de novo and acquired resistance to endocrine therapy, there remains a need to identify which ERα-positive (ERα(+))/PR-positive (PR(+)) tumors are most likely to respond. The purpose of this study was to use estrogen- and progestin-based radiopharmaceuticals to image ERα and PR in mouse mammary tumors at baseline and after hormonal therapy and to determine whether changes in these imaging biomarkers can serve as an early predictive indicator of therapeutic response. METHODS: Mammary adenocarcinomas that spontaneously develop in aged female mice deficient in signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) were used. Imaging of ERα and PR in primary tumor-bearing mice and mice implanted with mammary cell lines (SSM1, SSM2, and SSM3) derived from primary STAT1-deficient (STAT1(-/-)) tumors was performed. Hormonal treatments consisted of estradiol, an ER agonist; letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor; and fulvestrant, a pure ER antagonist. Small-animal PET/CT was performed using (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES) for ER, (18)F-fluoro furanyl norprogesterone ((18)F-FFNP) for PR, and (18)F-FDG for glucose uptake. Tracer uptake in the tumor was quantified and compared with receptor concentration determined by in vitro assays of resected tumors. RESULTS: Primary STAT1(-/-) mammary tumors and implanted SSM2 and SSM3 tumors showed high (18)F-FES and (18)F-FFNP uptake and were confirmed to be ERα(+)/PR(+). Classic estrogen-induced regulation of the progesterone receptor gene was demonstrated by increased (18)F-FFNP uptake of estradiol-treated SSM3 tumors. Treatment with fulvestrant decreased (18)F-FFNP, (18)F-FES, and (18)F-FDG uptake and inhibited growth of SSM3 tumors but decreased only (18)F-FES uptake in SSM2 tumors, with no effect on growth, despite both tumors being ERα(+)/PR(+). Decreased (18)F-FFNP uptake by SSM3 tumors occurred early after initiation of treatment, before measurable tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: Using small-animal PET, a profile was identified that distinguished fulvestrant-sensitive from fulvestrant-resistant ERα(+)/PR(+) tumors before changes in tumor size. This work demonstrates that imaging baseline tumoral (18)F-FES uptake and initial changes in (18)F-FFNP uptake in a noninvasive manner is a potentially useful strategy to identify responders and nonresponders to endocrine therapy at an early stage.
UNLABELLED: Estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) are expressed in most humanbreast cancers and are important predictive factors for directing therapy. Because of de novo and acquired resistance to endocrine therapy, there remains a need to identify which ERα-positive (ERα(+))/PR-positive (PR(+)) tumors are most likely to respond. The purpose of this study was to use estrogen- and progestin-based radiopharmaceuticals to image ERα and PR in mouse mammary tumors at baseline and after hormonal therapy and to determine whether changes in these imaging biomarkers can serve as an early predictive indicator of therapeutic response. METHODS: Mammary adenocarcinomas that spontaneously develop in aged female mice deficient in signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1) were used. Imaging of ERα and PR in primary tumor-bearing mice and mice implanted with mammary cell lines (SSM1, SSM2, and SSM3) derived from primary STAT1-deficient (STAT1(-/-)) tumors was performed. Hormonal treatments consisted of estradiol, an ER agonist; letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor; and fulvestrant, a pure ER antagonist. Small-animal PET/CT was performed using (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES) for ER, (18)F-fluoro furanyl norprogesterone ((18)F-FFNP) for PR, and (18)F-FDG for glucose uptake. Tracer uptake in the tumor was quantified and compared with receptor concentration determined by in vitro assays of resected tumors. RESULTS: Primary STAT1(-/-) mammary tumors and implanted SSM2 and SSM3 tumors showed high (18)F-FES and (18)F-FFNP uptake and were confirmed to be ERα(+)/PR(+). Classic estrogen-induced regulation of the progesterone receptor gene was demonstrated by increased (18)F-FFNP uptake of estradiol-treated SSM3 tumors. Treatment with fulvestrant decreased (18)F-FFNP, (18)F-FES, and (18)F-FDG uptake and inhibited growth of SSM3 tumors but decreased only (18)F-FES uptake in SSM2 tumors, with no effect on growth, despite both tumors being ERα(+)/PR(+). Decreased (18)F-FFNP uptake by SSM3 tumors occurred early after initiation of treatment, before measurable tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: Using small-animal PET, a profile was identified that distinguished fulvestrant-sensitive from fulvestrant-resistant ERα(+)/PR(+) tumors before changes in tumor size. This work demonstrates that imaging baseline tumoral (18)F-FES uptake and initial changes in (18)F-FFNP uptake in a noninvasive manner is a potentially useful strategy to identify responders and nonresponders to endocrine therapy at an early stage.
Authors: M Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; D Craig Allred; Karen L Hagerty; Sunil Badve; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Glenn Francis; Neil S Goldstein; Malcolm Hayes; David G Hicks; Susan Lester; Richard Love; Pamela B Mangu; Lisa McShane; Keith Miller; C Kent Osborne; Soonmyung Paik; Jane Perlmutter; Anthony Rhodes; Hironobu Sasano; Jared N Schwartz; Fred C G Sweep; Sheila Taube; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul Valenstein; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel Visscher; Thomas Wheeler; R Bruce Williams; James L Wittliff; Antonio C Wolff Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Farrokh Dehdashti; Richard Laforest; Feng Gao; Rebecca L Aft; Carmen S Dence; Dong Zhou; Kooresh I Shoghi; Barry A Siegel; John A Katzenellenbogen; Michael J Welch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: J E Mortimer; F Dehdashti; B A Siegel; K Trinkaus; J A Katzenellenbogen; M J Welch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antonio Aliaga; Jacques A Rousseau; René Ouellette; Jules Cadorette; Johan E van Lier; Roger Lecomte; Francois Bénard Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Szeman Ruby Chan; William Vermi; Jingqin Luo; Laura Lucini; Charles Rickert; Amy M Fowler; Silvia Lonardi; Cora Arthur; Larry Jt Young; David E Levy; Michael J Welch; Robert D Cardiff; Robert D Schreiber Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dong Zhou; Mai Lin; Norio Yasui; Mohammed H Al-Qahtani; Carmen S Dence; Sally Schwarz; John A Katzenellenbogen Journal: J Labelled Comp Radiopharm Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 1.921
Authors: Szeman Ruby Chan; Amy M Fowler; Julie A Allen; Dong Zhou; Carmen S Dence; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Farrokh Dehdashti; John A Katzenellenbogen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wendan Wang; Aashvini Belosay; Xujuan Yang; James A Hartman; Huaxin Song; Urszula T Iwaniec; Russell T Turner; Mona I Churchwell; Daniel R Doerge; William G Helferich Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 5.150