Literature DB >> 11825200

Time trade-off utility modified to accommodate degenerative and life-threatening conditions.

M W Kattan1, P A Fearn, B J Miles.   

Abstract

The time trade-off is often argued to be the preferred utility assessment method. When measuring current health in its classic form, it involves a comparison of two certainties: perfect health and current health, each for a fixed period of time and followed by death. This makes the time trade-off insensitive to patient fears regarding premature death or worsening health. We suggest the classic time trade-off be modified to include subjective rather than actuarial life expectancy, and relaxation of the current health option to include uncertainty in quantity and quality of life. We illustrate the mechanics of this modified time trade-off and report a preliminary application to 122 men presenting to a prostate cancer screening program. Further analysis of this modified time trade-off appears warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11825200      PMCID: PMC2243360     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methods for quality adjustment of life years.

Authors:  E Nord
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Automated utility assessment of global health.

Authors:  R F Nease; R Tsai; L M Hynes; B Littenberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.

Authors:  A E Clarke; M K Goldstein; D Michelson; A M Garber; L A Lenert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert; J Kievit; J W Leer; J D Habbema; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Preferences for health states: a review of measurement methods.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  Mead Johnson Symp Perinat Dev Med       Date:  1982

7.  Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.

Authors:  J Tsevat; N V Dawson; A W Wu; J Lynn; J R Soukup; E F Cook; H Vidaillet; R S Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The danger of applying group-level utilities in decision analyses of the treatment of localized prostate cancer in individual patients.

Authors:  M E Cowen; B J Miles; D F Cahill; R B Giesler; J R Beck; M W Kattan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 9.  Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; D Feeny; D A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert; J Kievit; J W Leer; G Stoter; J C de Haes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  1 in total

1.  Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Yvette Edelaar-Peeters; Matthijs M Versteegh; Elly A Stolk
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.