Literature DB >> 18351621

The duration effect: a link between TTO and VAS values.

Benjamin M Craig1.   

Abstract

The value of a health state may depend on how long an individual has had to endure the health state (i.e. hedonic load). In this paper, we test the constant proportionality (CP) assumption and determine the sign of relationship between duration and health state value for 42 health states using the nationally representative data from the United Kingdom Measurement and Valuation of Health study. The results reject the CP assumption and suggest that the relationship is negative for optimal health (i.e. fair innings argument) and that the relationship is positive for poorer health states (i.e. adaptation). We find no evidence of the maximum endurable time hypothesis using these data. This evidence on the duration effect has important implications for outcomes research and the economic evaluation of interventions. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18351621      PMCID: PMC2760230          DOI: 10.1002/hec.1356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  21 in total

1.  The validity of time trade-off values in calculating QALYs: constant proportional time trade-off versus the proportional heuristic.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Peep Stalmeier
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations.

Authors:  Joshua A Salomon; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs.

Authors:  H Bleichrodt; M Johannesson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  A test of the QALY model when health varies over time.

Authors:  Anne Spencer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Economic analysis alongside clinical trials. Revisiting the methodological issues.

Authors:  M F Drummond; L Davies
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert; J Kievit; J W Leer; J D Habbema; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Time in health: can we measure individuals' "pure time preferences"?

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 9.  Adaptation and well-being.

Authors:  J Heyink
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1993-12

10.  Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  T J Priestman; M Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Toward a more universal approach in health valuation.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Health Valuation: Demonstrating the Value of Health and Lifespan.

Authors:  Elly A Stolk; Benjamin M Craig; Brendan Mulhern; Derek S Brown
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  US valuation of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; A Simon Pickard; Elly Stolk; John E Brazier
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  From a different angle: a novel approach to health valuation.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Mark Oppe
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Sick but satisfied: the impact of life and health satisfaction on choice between health scenarios.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Georgios Kavetsos; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan Jv Busschbach
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2009-01-13

10.  Similar responses to EQ-5D-3L by two elicitation methods: visual analogue scale and time trade-off.

Authors:  Xiuying Wang; Lin Zhuo; Yifei Ma; Ting Cai; Aviva Must; Ling Xu; Lang Zhuo
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.