Literature DB >> 7559676

Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements: a more realistic model.

K A Mann1, D L Bartel, T M Wright, A H Burstein.   

Abstract

Loosening of cemented femoral hip stems could be initiated by failure of the cement mantle due to high cement stresses. The goals of this study were to determine if realistic stem-cement interface characteristics could result in high cement stresses when compared to a bonded stem-cement interface and to determine if stem design parameters could be chosen to reduce peak cement stresses. Three-dimensional finite-element models of cemented femoral hip components were studied with bonded or realistic Coulomb friction stem-cement interfaces. The results showed that the use of a non-bonded, non-linear Coulomb friction interface resulted in substantially different stress fields in the cement when compared to a bonded stem-cement interface. Tensile stresses in the proximal cement mantel for the Coulomb friction interface case (10.8 MPa) were greater than the fatigue strength of the cement. In contrast, the tensile stresses in the cement mantle were not greater than the fatigue strength for the bonded case (7.5 MPa). Failure of the cement mantle in the proximal femur could therefore be initiated by a lack of a bond at the stem-cement interface. The effect of different cross-sectional stem geometries (medial radii of 3.0, 4.9 and 5.5 mm and antero-posterior widths of 9.8 and 13.7 mm) and different elastic moduli (cobalt chromium alloy and titanium alloy) for the stem material were also evaluated for models with a Coulomb friction interface. Changes in the stem cross-section and elastic modulus had only limited effects on the stress distributions in the cement. Of the parameters evaluated in this study, the characteristics of the stem-cement interface had the largest effect on cement mantle stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7559676     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00158-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Leatha A Damron; Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Michael T Clarke; Richard J Cleary
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Lateral drill holes decrease strength of the femur: an observational study using finite element and experimental analyses.

Authors:  Melanie J Fox; Jennie M Scarvell; Paul N Smith; Shankar Kalyanasundaram; Zbigniew H Stachurski
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Optimization of a Functionally Graded Material Stem in the Femoral Component of a Cemented Hip Arthroplasty: Influence of Dimensionality of FGM.

Authors:  Abdellah Ait Moussa; Rohan Yadav
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2017-06-21

5.  Minimizing Stress Shielding and Cement Damage in Cemented Femoral Component of a Hip Prosthesis through Computational Design Optimization.

Authors:  Abdellah Ait Moussa; Justin Fischer; Rohan Yadav; Morshed Khandaker
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Biomechanical optimization of different fixation modes for a proximal femoral L-osteotomy.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Weng-Pin Chen; Hsih-Hao Chen; Chien-Yu Lin; Mel S Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Yung-Chou Chen; Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.