Literature DB >> 7559409

Codon pair utilization biases influence translational elongation step times.

B Irwin1, J D Heck, G W Hatfield.   

Abstract

Two independent assays capable of measuring the relative in vivo translational step times across a selected codon pair in a growing polypeptide in the bacterium Escherichia coli have been employed to demonstrate that codon pairs observed in protein coding sequences more frequently than predicted (over-represented codon pairs) are translated slower than pairs observed less frequently than expected (under-represented codon pairs). These results are consistent with the findings that translational step times are influenced by codon context and that these context effects are related to the compatabilities of adjacent tRNA isoacceptor molecules on the surface of a translating ribosome. These results also support our previous suggestion that the frequency of one codon next to another has co-evolved with the structure and abundance of tRNA isoacceptors in order to control the rates of translational step times without imposing additional constraints on amino acid sequences or protein structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7559409     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.39.22801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  70 in total

1.  Enhancement of translation by the downstream box does not involve base pairing of mRNA with the penultimate stem sequence of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  M O'Connor; T Asai; C L Squires; A E Dahlberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes.

Authors:  Alexei Fedorov; Serge Saxonov; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Predicted highly expressed genes of diverse prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  S Karlin; J Mrázek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Avoidance of long mononucleotide repeats in codon pair usage.

Authors:  Tingting Gu; Shengjun Tan; Xiaoxi Gou; Hitoshi Araki; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Control of translation efficiency in yeast by codon-anticodon interactions.

Authors:  Daniel P Letzring; Kimberly M Dean; Elizabeth J Grayhack
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 6.  You're one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression.

Authors:  Mark Welch; Alan Villalobos; Claes Gustafsson; Jeremy Minshull
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Conservation of location of several specific inhibitory codon pairs in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts reveals translational selection.

Authors:  Dalia H Ghoneim; Xiaoju Zhang; Christina E Brule; David H Mathews; Elizabeth J Grayhack
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Recognition of AUG and alternative initiator codons is augmented by G in position +4 but is not generally affected by the nucleotides in positions +5 and +6.

Authors:  M Kozak
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Strategies for achieving high-level expression of genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S C Makrides
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-09

10.  All-codon scanning identifies p53 cancer rescue mutations.

Authors:  Roberta Baronio; Samuel A Danziger; Linda V Hall; Kirsty Salmon; G Wesley Hatfield; Richard H Lathrop; Peter Kaiser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.