Literature DB >> 30576464

Conservation of location of several specific inhibitory codon pairs in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts reveals translational selection.

Dalia H Ghoneim1,2, Xiaoju Zhang1,2, Christina E Brule1,2, David H Mathews1,2, Elizabeth J Grayhack1,2.   

Abstract

Synonymous codons provide redundancy in the genetic code that influences translation rates in many organisms, in which overall codon use is driven by selection for optimal codons. It is unresolved if or to what extent translational selection drives use of suboptimal codons or codon pairs. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 17 specific inhibitory codon pairs, each comprised of adjacent suboptimal codons, inhibit translation efficiency in a manner distinct from their constituent codons, and many are translated slowly in native genes. We show here that selection operates within Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts to conserve nine of these codon pairs at defined positions in genes. Conservation of these inhibitory codon pairs is significantly greater than expected, relative to conservation of their constituent codons, with seven pairs more highly conserved than any other synonymous pair. Conservation is strongly correlated with slow translation of the pairs. Conservation of suboptimal codon pairs extends to two related Candida species, fungi that diverged from Saccharomyces ∼270 million years ago, with an enrichment for codons decoded by I•A and U•G wobble in both Candida and Saccharomyces. Thus, conservation of inhibitory codon pairs strongly implies selection for slow translation at particular gene locations, executed by suboptimal codon pairs.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30576464      PMCID: PMC6379720          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  82 in total

1.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.

Authors:  Mario dos Reis; Renos Savva; Lorenz Wernisch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Nils A Kulak; Garwin Pichler; Igor Paron; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  On some principles governing molecular evolution.

Authors:  M Kimura; T Ohta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Codon Bias as a Means to Fine-Tune Gene Expression.

Authors:  Tessa E F Quax; Nico J Claassens; Dieter Söll; John van der Oost
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Codon pair utilization biases influence translational elongation step times.

Authors:  B Irwin; J D Heck; G W Hatfield
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Dom34 rescues ribosomes in 3' untranslated regions.

Authors:  Nicholas R Guydosh; Rachel Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Synonymous Codons Direct Cotranslational Folding toward Different Protein Conformations.

Authors:  Florian Buhr; Sujata Jha; Michael Thommen; Joerg Mittelstaet; Felicitas Kutz; Harald Schwalbe; Marina V Rodnina; Anton A Komar
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.