Literature DB >> 7558987

Brainstem frequency-following and behavioral responses during selective attention to pure tone and missing fundamental stimuli.

G C Galbraith1, B Q Doan.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT), discrimination sensitivity (d'), and the brainstem frequency-following response (FFR) were recorded in 32 subjects performing a selective attention task. Auditory stimuli were a 400 Hz pure tone and a complex "missing fundamental" (MF) presented dichotically to separate ears (channels). In two tasks, infrequent target stimuli were either of lower intensity or greater duration than standard stimuli. Behavioral results showed consistently better performance (faster RTs and higher d' scores) in the duration task, and better overall detection of MF targets. FFR attention effects were evidenced by differing amplitudes in attend and ignore conditions. Amplitudes in the attended channel were larger to MF stimuli in both tasks, and to the tone stimulus in the duration task. Responses to tone in the intensity task, however, were lowest when the channel was attended, perhaps reflecting some property of greater task difficulty. The demonstration of FFR amplitude differences between attended and ignored channels suggests that selective attention can modify brainstem evoked responses in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7558987     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00008-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  13 in total

1.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Functional Interplay Between the Putative Measures of Rostral and Caudal Efferent Regulation of Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Sandeep Maruthy; U Ajith Kumar; G Nike Gnanateja
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 4.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Spatial attention modulates the precedence effect.

Authors:  Sam London; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09

8.  Selective attention modulates human auditory brainstem responses: relative contributions of frequency and spatial cues.

Authors:  Alexandre Lehmann; Marc Schönwiesner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Auditory-Brainstem Response to Continuous, Non-repetitive Speech Is Modulated by the Speech Envelope and Reflects Speech Processing.

Authors:  Chagit S Reichenbach; Chananel Braiman; Nicholas D Schiff; A J Hudspeth; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Task-related suppression of the brainstem frequency following response.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Tomasz R Letowski; Kaleb McDowell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.