Literature DB >> 7558066

A novel electric design for electromagnetic stimulation--the Slinky coil.

C Ren1, P P Tarjan, D B Popović.   

Abstract

A novel coil design for inductive electromagnetic stimulation of neural cells has been simulated and experimentally tested. This coil improves the focal effect of a magnetic stimulator, and it reduces its inductance, hence the efficiency of the system is improved. The basic structure of the device is derived from the popular "Slinky" toy. The actual device is formed by winding different numbers of loops forming a helical coil on a half torus. The loops are bunched at the axis of the torus. The coil, due to its geometry, generates a unique distribution of eddy currents in nearby tissues which is favorable compared to a solenoid type stimulator. This renders the Slinky coil more selective than conventional coils used for magnetic stimulation. The distribution of eddy currents was analyzed using Matlab, following Faraday's Law of Induction. Improved focality permits the current through the coil to be reduced for the same effect. In addition, the reduced inductance of the Slinky coil decreases the power requirement; thus, the improved efficiency of the system may allow the generation of bursts of pulses, and expand the utilization of the system to possible functional activation of certain neuro-muscular structures when peripheral nerves are stimulated.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7558066     DOI: 10.1109/10.412658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  9 in total

1.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  [Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in basic and clinical neuroscience research].

Authors:  A Valero-Cabré; A Pascual-Leone; O A Coubard
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.607

4.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS.

Authors:  Dylan Edwards; Mar Cortes; Abhishek Datta; Preet Minhas; Eric M Wassermann; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  Magnetic stimulation for non-homogeneous biological structures.

Authors:  Vessela T Krasteva; Sava P Papazov; Ivan K Daskalov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Effect of contour shape of nervous system electromagnetic stimulation coils on the induced electrical field distribution.

Authors:  Sava P Papazov; Ivan K Daskalov
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  The effects of high-frequency rTMS over the left DLPFC on cognitive control in young healthy participants.

Authors:  Yanmin Li; Lin Wang; Meng Jia; Jihong Guo; Huijun Wang; Mingwei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.