Literature DB >> 7556721

How successful is corneal transplantation? A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register.

K A Williams1, S M Muehlberg, R F Lewis, D J Coster.   

Abstract

Corneal graft outcome was assessed within a large, prospectively collected database of 4499 records. Penetrating corneal graft survival was 91% at 1 year, 72% at 5 years and 69% at 7 years. The three most common indications for graft were keratoconus (30%), bullous keratopathy (25%) and failed previous graft (18%); the three most common causes of graft failure were rejection (34%), infection (18%) and glaucoma (9%). The vast majority of grafts were performed for improved visual acuity. About four-fifths of recipients achieved at least one line of better acuity on the Snellen chart post-operatively; of the remainder with unchanged or worse acuity, only 21% had failed grafts. Overall, 43% of recipients achieved a best corrected Snellen acuity of 6/12 or better, 52% achieved 6/18 or better, and 20% had acuitities of less than 6/60. Reasons for poor post-operative acuity (recorded as less than 6/60) included graft failure (41%) and comorbidities in the grafted eye (43%). A number of risk factors for graft failure were examined: in most instances, there was little room for decision-making or expert intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7556721     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1995.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of corneal graft rejection in a mouse model.

Authors:  J Plsková; L Kuffová; V Holán; M Filipec; J V Forrester
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Are cytokine patterns in aqueous humour useful in distinguishing corneal graft rejection from opacification due to herpetic stromal keratitis?

Authors:  E B van Gelderen; A Van der Lelij; H J Völker-Dieben; R van der Gaag; R Peek; W F Treffers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data.

Authors:  P Beckingsale; I Mavrikakis; N Al-Yousuf; E Mavrikakis; S M Daya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Visual outcomes and graft survival following corneal transplants: the need for an Irish National Corneal Transplant Registry.

Authors:  M Guerin; E O' Connell; C Walsh; T Fulcher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Graft failure: I. Endothelial cell loss.

Authors:  Ilse Claerhout; Hilde Beele; Philippe Kestelyn
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Outcome of corneal transplantation: can a prioritisation system predict outcome?

Authors:  Patrick P R Saunders; Lyn M Sibley; John S F Richards; Simon P Holland; Debbie L Chow; Paul Courtright
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  E-Selectin Mediates Immune Cell Trafficking in Corneal Transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas H Dohlman; Antonio Di Zazzo; Masahiro Omoto; Jing Hua; Julia Ding; Pedram Hamrah; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  [Standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): technique and latest results].

Authors:  P P Ciechanowski; K Droutsas; L Baydoun; M Dirisamer; S Oellerich; G R J Melles
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  A retrospective clinical study of Xinjiang Uygur patients with corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Reziwan Maimaitiming; Xin Yang; Kelala Wupuer; Nan Ye; Na Kong; Baoyu Gu; Yuanyuan Fan; Lan Shao; Zhiqiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

10.  Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting.

Authors:  J Plskova; L Kuffova; M Filipec; V Holan; J V Forrester
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.