Literature DB >> 16714264

Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data.

P Beckingsale1, I Mavrikakis, N Al-Yousuf, E Mavrikakis, S M Daya.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine long term graft survival rates and visual results for different indications for penetrating keratoplasty from a single institution over 10 years and compare these to national outcome data.
METHODS: Retrospective chart analysis. 784 records were available for review of 1096 consecutive penetrating keratoplasty procedures performed between 1990 and 1999 (72%). Outcomes of graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism were analysed and compared to national outcome data supplied by the UK Transplant Service.
RESULTS: At 5 year follow up, overall graft survival was 66%. This was subdivided into 98% for keratoconus, 86% for viral keratitis, 85% for Fuchs' dystrophy, 84% for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, 55% for regrafts, and 57% for other diagnoses. There was a significantly higher graft survival rate for all diagnostic subgroups except Fuchs' dystrophy at 3 years of follow up compared to the national average. Best corrected visual acuity at 5 years was 6/18 or better in 53% of cases. The mean keratometric astigmatism was 3.4 dioptres.
CONCLUSION: Penetrating keratoplasty is a safe and effective treatment for selected corneal disorders. Penetrating keratoplasty for viral keratitis may achieve good results with long term antiviral treatment. Patients may achieve better outcomes if their surgery is performed at specialist centres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16714264      PMCID: PMC1860233          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.086272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  21 in total

1.  Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators.

Authors:  A Vail; S M Gore; B A Bradley; D L Easty; C A Rogers
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Long-term outcome in corneal allotransplantation. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry.

Authors:  K A Williams; S M Muehlberg; R F Lewis; D J Coster
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1997 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  The success and survival of repeat corneal grafts.

Authors:  C M Kirkness; E Ezra; N S Rice; A D Steele
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual outcome and success.

Authors:  L Lim; K Pesudovs; D J Coster
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Systemic ciclosporin A in high-risk keratoplasties.

Authors:  T Reinhard; R Sundmacher; P Heering
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis and keratoconus. Allograft rejection and survival.

Authors:  R J Epstein; J A Seedor; N G Dreizen; R D Stulting; G O Waring; L A Wilson; H D Cavanagh
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity, and astigmatism. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators.

Authors:  A Vail; S M Gore; B A Bradley; D L Easty; C A Rogers; W J Armitate
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  How successful is corneal transplantation? A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register.

Authors:  K A Williams; S M Muehlberg; R F Lewis; D J Coster
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J J Ing; H H Ing; L R Nelson; D O Hodge; W M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Prognosis and management of corneal transplantation for herpetic keratitis.

Authors:  L M Cobo; D J Coster; N S Rice; B R Jones
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the New York Eye and Ear experience.

Authors:  A P Patel; E I Wu; D C Ritterband; J A Seedor
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  [Postkeratoplasty astigmatism: comparison of three suturing techniques].

Authors:  I Naydis; M Klemm; A Hassenstein; G Richard; T Katz; S J Linke
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Toric add-on intraocular lenses for correction of high astigmatism after pseudophakic keratoplasty].

Authors:  A Hassenstein; F Niemeck; K Giannakakis; M Klemm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Herpes simplex epithelial and stromal keratitis: an epidemiologic update.

Authors:  Asim V Farooq; Deepak Shukla
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.

Authors:  Shawn M Iverson; Oriel Spierer; George C Papachristou; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; David S Greenfield; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  Indications, surgical procedures and outcomes of keratoplasty at a Tertiary University-based hospital: a review of 10 years' experience.

Authors:  Eman M Al-Sharif; Majed Alkharashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 7.  Pharmacologic strategies in the prevention and treatment of corneal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Khalid F Tabbara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in corneal transplantation-A review.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Mario Montana; Samuel M Santosa; Irene D Isjwara; Yu-Hui Huang; Kyu-Yeon Han; Christopher O'Neil; Ashley Wang; Maria Soledad Cortina; Jose de la Cruz; Qiang Zhou; Mark I Rosenblatt; Jin-Hong Chang; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Endothelial cell counts after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta; Arundhati Anshu; Hon Kiat Wong; Hla M Htoon; Donald Tan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-03

10.  Perioperative and postoperative risk factors for corneal graft failure.

Authors:  Alice L Yu; Michaela Kaiser; Markus Schaumberger; Elisabeth Messmer; Daniel Kook; Ulrich Welge-Lussen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.