Literature DB >> 15317718

Quantitative evaluation of the corneal endothelium in the mouse after grafting.

J Plskova1, L Kuffova, M Filipec, V Holan, J V Forrester.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Corneal graft survival depends critically on the quality of the endothelium. In this study the authors aimed to evaluate corneal endothelium in mice at different times after transplantation and to correlate endothelial integrity with corneal graft survival.
METHODS: Syngeneic and allogeneic corneal grafts at various times (days 0-60) after engraftment were examined in flat mount preparation by confocal microscopy, by evaluating the hexagonal pattern of the endothelial monolayer using actin staining of the cell cortex. Corneas from untreated mice and from mice, who were grafted after removal of draining lymph nodes served as controls.
RESULTS: In control corneas, more than 90% of the posterior surface was covered by endothelium. Syngeneic grafts were always covered by 54-99% of endothelium. In contrast, the posterior surface of corneal allografts showed great variation in the degree of endothelial cell coverage (0-98%). In addition, clinical opacity grading measure was not a reliable predictor of endothelial coverage.
CONCLUSION: In corneal allografts there is progressive loss of endothelium over time, unlike with syngeneic grafts. However, in the early stages of allograft rejection, the grade of graft opacity does not accurately reflect the degree of endothelial cell coverage. Although corneal opacity grade is considered the main determinant of graft rejection, the data suggest that both the grade of corneal opacity plus a sufficient post-graft time duration (>8 weeks in the mouse) are required for the diagnosis of irreversible graft rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15317718      PMCID: PMC1772317          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.038703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  40 in total

Review 1.  The immune privilege of corneal allografts.

Authors:  J Y Niederkorn
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Identification and characterization of cells infiltrating the graft and aqueous humour in rat corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  D F Larkin; V L Calder; S L Lightman
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Labeling of cycling corneal endothelial cells during healing with a monoclonal antibody to the Ki67 antigen (MIB-1).

Authors:  W M Petroll; J V Jester; J Bean; H D Cavanagh
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Intranasally induced immunological tolerance is determined by characteristics of the draining lymph nodes: studies with OVA and human cartilage gp-39.

Authors:  D A Wolvers; C J Coenen-de Roo; R E Mebius; M J van der Cammen; F Tirion; A M Miltenburg; G Kraal
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 5.  Rethinking immunological privilege: implications for corneal and limbal stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  K A Williams; D J Coster
Journal:  Mol Med Today       Date:  1997-11

Review 6.  A vision of cell death: insights into immune privilege.

Authors:  T A Ferguson; T S Griffith
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 12.988

7.  Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation promotes corneal allograft survival.

Authors:  J Y Niederkorn; J Mellon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Corneal endothelial cell proliferation and migration after penetrating keratoplasty in rabbits.

Authors:  Y Nakahori; C Katakami; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  The spatial organization of apical junctional complex-associated proteins in feline and human corneal endothelium.

Authors:  W M Petroll; J K Hsu; J Bean; H D Cavanagh; J V Jester
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  Actin 'purse string' filaments are anchored by E-cadherin-mediated adherens junctions at the leading edge of the epithelial wound, providing coordinated cell movement.

Authors:  Y Danjo; I K Gipson
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantification of allospecific and nonspecific corneal endothelial cell damage after corneal transplantation.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; U Jurkunas; T Funaki; M Dastjerdi; R Dana
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Promotes Corneal Allograft Survival.

Authors:  Vannarut Satitpitakul; Zhongmou Sun; Kunal Suri; Afsaneh Amouzegar; Kishore R Katikireddy; Ula V Jurkunas; Ahmad Kheirkhah; Reza Dana
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  High-risk corneal allografts: A therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Tian Yu; Vijayalakshmi Rajendran; May Griffith; John V Forrester; Lucia Kuffová
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-24

4.  Ex vivo transfer of Smad7 decreases damage to the corneal endothelium after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Toshinari Funaki; Nobuyuki Ebihara; Akira Murakami; Atsuhito Nakao
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Regeneration of corneal endothelium following complete endothelial cell loss in rat keratoplasty.

Authors:  J Schwartzkopff; L Bredow; S Mahlenbrey; D Boehringer; T Reinhard
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.367

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.