Literature DB >> 7552649

Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study.

A F Bendix1, T Bendix, S Ostenfeld, E Bush.   

Abstract

Several new studies have indicated that an active approach to patients with chronic disabling low back pain (LBP) seems effective. Some of these studies emphasize the importance of dealing with the patient's total situation in comprehensive multidisciplinary programs--the bio-psycho-social model. However, these programs are expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rehabilitation outcome from three different active programs in terms of: (1) return-to-work rate, (2) days of sick leave, (3) health-care contacts, (4) pain and disability scores, and (5) staying physically active. The subjects included 132 patients randomized to the study, of whom 123 started one of the treatment programs. They had all had at least 6 months of chronic LBP. The patients were randomized into one of three programs: group 1--a full-time, intensive 3-week multidisciplinary program, including active physical and ergonomic training and psychological pain management, followed by 1 day weekly for the subsequent 3 weeks; group 2--active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, for a total of 24h; group 3--psychological pain management combined with active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, also for a total of 24h. The results presented here are based on data collected 4 months following treatment, which shows an 86% response rate. The initial examination and the follow-up evaluation were performed by a blinded observer. The results show that 4 months after treatment, the intensive multidisciplinary program is superior to the less intensive programs in terms of return-to-work rate, health-care contacts, pain and disability scores, and staying physically active.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552649     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  Functional restoration. Pitfalls in evaluating efficacy.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; T G Mayer; R G Hazard; J Rainville; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Physiotherapy exercises and back pain: a blinded review.

Authors:  B W Koes; L M Bouter; H Beckerman; G J van der Heijden; P G Knipschild
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-29

3.  A benefit of spinal manipulation as adjunctive therapy for acute low-back pain: a stratified controlled trial.

Authors:  N M Hadler; P Curtis; D B Gillings; S Stinnett
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Assessment of severity in low-back disorders.

Authors:  G Waddell; C J Main
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Conservative therapy for low back pain. Distinguishing useful from useless therapy.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Serial lumbar dynamometry in low back pain.

Authors:  C Cooke; M R Menard; G N Beach; S R Locke; G H Hirsch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pain complaint--exercise performance relationship in chronic pain.

Authors:  W Fordyce; R McMahon; G Rainwater; S Jackins; K Questad; T Murphy; B De Lateur
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulation therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain.

Authors:  F C Powell; W C Hanigan; W C Olivero
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Spinal rehabilitation by work tolerance based on objective physical capacity assessment of dysfunction. A prospective study with control subjects and twelve-month review.

Authors:  B L Sachs; J A David; D Olimpio; A D Scala; M Lacroix
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part II. Effects on physical measurements three months after treatment.

Authors:  G Mellin; H Hurri; K Härkäpää; A Järvikoski
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1989
View more
  12 in total

1.  Long-term effects of supervised physical training in secondary prevention of low back pain.

Authors:  Irina Maul; Thomas Läubli; Michael Oliveri; Helmut Krueger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability?

Authors:  Catherine Briand; Marie-José Durand; Louise St-Arnaud; Marc Corbière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08

Review 4.  Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eline M Meijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  J Guzmán; R Esmail; K Karjalainen; A Malmivaara; E Irvin; C Bombardier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

6.  Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Carol Coole; Avril Drummond; Sayeed Khan; Catriona McDaid; Catherine Hewitt; Lucksy Kottam; Sarah Ronaldson; Elizabeth Coleman; David A McDonald; Fiona Nouri; Melanie Narayanasamy; Iain McNamara; Judith Fitch; Louise Thomson; Gerry Richardson; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  The outcome of a functional restoration programme for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M Sivan; B Sell; P Sell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Intensive interdisciplinary outpatient pain management program for chronic back pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Juraj Artner; Stephan Kurz; Balkan Cakir; Heiko Reichel; Friederike Lattig
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 9.  Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.

Authors:  Myrthe van Vilsteren; Sandra H van Oostrom; Henrica C W de Vet; Renée-Louise Franche; Cécile R L Boot; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 10.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Marienke van Middelkoop; Sidney M Rubinstein; Ton Kuijpers; Arianne P Verhagen; Raymond Ostelo; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.