Literature DB >> 1385659

Serial lumbar dynamometry in low back pain.

C Cooke1, M R Menard, G N Beach, S R Locke, G H Hirsch.   

Abstract

To determine the significance of changes in motor performance as measured by lumbar dynamometry, serial lumbar dynamometry was performed on a group of 45 male Workers' Compensation patients with chronic "mechanical" low back pain and in a group of 20 healthy male volunteers. The patients were men aged 20-60 years, whose current episode of low back pain had lasted for at least 3 months (mean 19.5 weeks, range 12-47 weeks). Testing was performed at entry into a "back school" program of therapy and again 2 weeks and 4 weeks later. The control group showed a slight improvement in almost all variables of strength and range of motion between the first and second tests but no significant change between the second and third tests. This was consistent with a learning effect. The patient group was analyzed as a whole and also in two groups based on their response to the Waddell maneuvers at entry: Waddell score 0-2 (no excessive illness behavior) and 3-5 (excessive illness behavior). As a whole, the patients showed significant progressive improvement in most variables on successive tests. The group with the low Waddell score had significantly greater strength and range of motion than the group with the high Waddell score but the trend of improvement with time was similar in the two groups. The authors conclude that in this sample of patients with low back pain, serial lumbar dynamometry reveals a progressive improvement in performance, which is greater than the improvement expected from the natural history of physical recovery and greater than the improvement expected from an increase in strength and range of motion attributable to the therapeutic exercises performed and is much larger than any learning effect related to the test procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385659     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199206000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  A A Vendrig
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

3.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

4.  Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study.

Authors:  A F Bendix; T Bendix; S Ostenfeld; E Bush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability of lumbar dynamometry measurements in patients with chronic low back pain with test-retest measurements on different days.

Authors:  M M Hutten; H J Hermens
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.