Literature DB >> 7552627

Prospective hospital-based survey of attitudes of Southern women toward surgical treatment of breast cancer.

J P Wei1, R M Sherry, B L Baisden, J Peckel, G Lala.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery is equivalent to total mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. The Southern part of the United States has a low rate of breast conservation.
METHODS: We surveyed 300 women: 100 hospital personnel, 100 cancer clinic patients, and 100 non-cancer clinic patients. The women were asked about their attitudes toward breast cancer, surgery preferences, and factors that might influence their decisions.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine chose mastectomy as the best operation, 106 women chose lumpectomy, and five women were undecided. There was no difference in mean age, racial distribution, education level, income level, percentage of women who considered themselves Southern women, concerns about breast cancer, recent mammograms, previous breast surgery, previous breast cancer treatment, or acquaintances with breast cancer between the mastectomy and the lumpectomy groups. Women interested in saving the breast were more likely to pick lumpectomy (35 vs. 84%, p = 0.001). A fear of cancer recurrence played a role in the decision (88 vs. 40%, p = 0.001). Fear of radiation therapy (76 vs. 57%, p = 0.002) and of the side effects (80 vs. 63%, p = 0.005) was a significant factor.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgery for breast cancer is an individual process between a woman and her surgeon. Attitudes and fears regarding cancer recurrence and radiation therapy may make women select mastectomy over lumpectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552627     DOI: 10.1007/bf02307070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

1.  Mastectomy or breast conservation in the management of primary breast cancer: psychosocial factors.

Authors:  W H Wolberg
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.990

2.  Healthy women's preferences in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  B Valanis; C Rumpler
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1982-12

3.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy: patient preferences in a community practice in Kentucky.

Authors:  P S Tate; E M McGee; S F Hopkins; E L Rogers; G V Page
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Are modified radical mastectomies done for T1 breast cancers because of surgeon's advice or patient's choice?

Authors:  B B Tarbox; J K Rockwood; C M Abernathy
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.565

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; D L Covington; R Rutledge; M P Churchill; A A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  What matters most: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery encounter decision aids across socioeconomic strata.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Renata West Yen; A James O'Malley; Mary C Politi; Shubhada Dhage; Kari Rosenkranz; Katie Weichman; Julie Margenthaler; Anna N A Tosteson; Eloise Crayton; Sherrill Jackson; Ann Bradley; Robert J Volk; Karen Sepucha; Elissa Ozanne; Sanja Percac-Lima; Julia Song; Jocelyn Acosta; Nageen Mir; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Adapting the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument for Lower Socioeconomic Status: Improving Readability, Acceptability, and Relevance.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Julia Song; Renata West Yen; Karen Sepucha; Mary C Politi; Shubhada Dhage; Kari Rosenkranz; Julie Margenthaler; Anna N A Tosteson; Eloise Crayton; Sherrill Jackson; Ann Bradley; A James O'Malley; Robert J Volk; Elissa Ozanne; Sanja Percac-Lima; Jocelyn Acosta; Nageen Mir; Peter Scalia; Abigail Ward; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2018-11-25

5.  Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction.

Authors:  Demetris Stavrou; Oren Weissman; Anna Polyniki; Neofytos Papageorgiou; Joseph Haik; Nimrod Farber; Eyal Winkler
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.