Literature DB >> 1443364

Are modified radical mastectomies done for T1 breast cancers because of surgeon's advice or patient's choice?

B B Tarbox1, J K Rockwood, C M Abernathy.   

Abstract

Clinical trials show that T1 breast cancers are equally well treated with breast-conserving surgery as with modified radical mastectomy. However, the Colorado Central Cancer Registry indicates that, for the past 5 years, the majority of women (72%) with T1 breast cancer in Colorado have undergone modified radical mastectomies. A questionnaire was sent to 175 general surgeons to determine the reasons for the high number of modified radical mastectomies still being performed. The results indicate that one group of surgeons (34% of those responding) believes each type of surgery has equal survival rates but unknowingly influences the patient to choose modified radical mastectomy, with a subtly biased presentation. Education of both surgeons and patients is needed to increase the number of patients with T1 breast lesions who can benefit from breast-conserving therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1443364     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)81172-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  14 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Significant increase in breast conservation in 16 years of trials conducted by the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Raimund Jakesz; Hellmut Samonigg; Michael Gnant; Ernst Kubista; Dieter Depisch; Roland Kolb; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Rainer-Christian Menzel; Peter Steindorfer; Werner Kwasny; Christoph Tausch; Michael Stierer; Susanne Taucher; Michael Seifert; Hubert Hausmaninger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Commercialization of BRCA1/2 testing: practitioner awareness and use of a new genetic test.

Authors:  M K Cho; P Sankar; P R Wolpe; L Godmilow
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-03-19

4.  Correct information to patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery: the medicolegal significance.

Authors:  A Sanguinetti; A Polistena; R Luchini; M Monacelli; S Avenia; S Galasse; R Cirocchi; N Avenia
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

5.  Breast cancer surgery: who chooses and how?

Authors:  R G Margolese
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: patterns of care in a geographic region and estimation of potential applicability.

Authors:  R S Foster; M E Farwell; M C Costanza
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Clinicopathologic factors and patient perceptions associated with surgical breast-conserving treatment.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; J G Maxwell; D L Covington; P Churchill; S E Smith; E K Covan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prospective hospital-based survey of attitudes of Southern women toward surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Wei; R M Sherry; B L Baisden; J Peckel; G Lala
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; D L Covington; R Rutledge; M P Churchill; A A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction.

Authors:  Demetris Stavrou; Oren Weissman; Anna Polyniki; Neofytos Papageorgiou; Joseph Haik; Nimrod Farber; Eyal Winkler
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.